Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: PeaceBeWithYou
I'll give Hutchinson and Gramm cheers for voting Guilty on Perjury and Obstruction. Will you give them boos for voting to allow only three witnesses at the trial?
73 posted on 01/02/2002 12:54:14 PM PST by Tymesup
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies ]


To: Tymesup
The vote for calling witnesses was 56-44 along party lines with the exception of the lone democrat, Russell Feingold who voted with the 55 Republicans. Part of that resolution was that live witnesses be called for clarification of any questions the jurors had. All other witness testimony was already deposed, which is done every day all over the nation.

Given that there was no 2/3rds majority that would remove clinton, and the testimony of all deposed witnesses is in the record, it matters little if they were all called to testify in person. 44 sinator(RATS) wouldn't have removed clinton if the Lord himself had told them to do so.

As it is, the best thing that could have happened did happen. We have GWB instead of algore, and clinton is sinking futher into his true legacy every hour of the day and night.

So no, I can't say I blame Kay, or Lott, or any of the Senators for being realist and dragging the Office of the Presidency down farther than clinton already had, in an attempt to rid us of one RAT(clinton) for another RAT(gore) that would have prolly sailed into a further 4, 8, or more years of RAT rule.

Pax vobiscum

76 posted on 01/02/2002 1:48:11 PM PST by PeaceBeWithYou
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson