Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

NYT MOVIE REVIEW | 'BLACK HAWK DOWN' Mission of Mercy Goes Bad in Africa
New York Times ^ | 12-28-01 | ELVIS MITCHELL

Posted on 12/29/2001 12:10:29 AM PST by Pharmboy

December 28, 2001

Black Hawk Down" has such distinctive visual aplomb that its jingoism starts to feel like part of its atmosphere. Establishing mood through pictorial means is the director Ridley Scott's most notable talent. There may be no working director more accomplished at wringing texture out of the color blue than the prodigious and now prolific Mr. Scott; you'd swear that with his dazzling washes of blues and sand tones, he was inventing additional hues on the spot. Because Mr. Scott's eye delivers so much information, he then is at a loss to give the material a proper emotional grounding. "Black Hawk Down" is like Mr. Scott's "G.I. Jane" but this time with an all-boy cast.

Sam Shepard, as Major General Garrison, seems to be smoking a Montecristo No. 2 primarily so that billowing clouds of Cuban smoke can register in the war room; it doesn't help that the cigar has been given as much characterization as anyone in the movie. There are plot flags visible beside Old Glory. As in "Pearl Harbor," the battle in "Black Hawk Down" is an eye-catching misfire, color-coordinated down to the tracer rounds.

The film, whose title refers to downed military helicopters, dramatizes the failed United States mission to help relieve famine in Mogadishu, Somalia, late in 1992 by securing supply routes against Somali militias. Several hundred Somalis and 18 American soldiers lost their lives the next year in what was called the Battle of the Black Sea. The film was adapted from the best-selling account by Mark Bowden, which stacked up detail; Mr. Scott's slathering of visual elements is the pictorial correlative of the author's work.

The producer Jerry Bruckheimer seems to have been making Ridley Scott movies his entire career, but this is the first time he and Mr. Scott have collaborated. Tony Scott, Mr. Ridley's twin brother, teamed with Mr. Bruckheimer on movies like "Top Gun," the gold — or rather gold-filled — standard for incoherent militaristic propaganda. "Black Hawk Down" is "Top Gun" on an all-protein diet. The soldiers, mostly ground troops, are much leaner than Tom Cruise was in that 1986 film, though they grin just as righteously.

The movie quickly sketches the broad parameters for the story: American troops, in Mogadishu as part of a United Nations peacekeeping effort, plan to kidnap members of the inner circle of Gen. Muhammad Farah Aidid, the Somali warlord. Lean, lissome white soldiers with teeth pearlier than their eyes prowl the streets looking to do damage — all except sad-eyed Sergeant Eversmann (Josh Hartnett), who smiles shyly and says he wants to make a difference. The vibrating melancholy of Hans Zimmer's score communicates the futility of Eversmann's proclamation. And when two helicopters are brought down and the mission is converted into a rescue, things get worse than anyone could have imagined.

"Black Hawk Down" wants to be about something, and in the midst of the meticulously staged gunfire, the picture seems to choose futility arbitrarily. The handsomely staged gunplay and explosions, rigorously matched to exacting Dolby Digital in selected theaters, abound, while a cast of non-American actors like Ewan McGregor, Eric Bana and Orlando Bloom try out their Yankee soldier accents, with vowels so oddly enunciated that you expect them to be singled out as foreign spies. Again, Mr. Scott spot-welds his extraordinary painterly application of talent to video game detachment; his "Gladiator" looked like a Playstation 2 product designed by Bruegel. But the mercilessness here is gruesome.

In "Black Hawk Down," the lack of characterization converts the Somalis into a pack of snarling dark-skinned beasts, gleefully pulling the Americans from their downed aircraft and stripping them. Intended or not, it reeks of glumly staged racism. The only African-American with lines, Specialist Kurth (Gabriel Casseus), is one of the American soldiers who want to get into the middle of the action; his lines communicate his simplistic gung-ho spirit. His presence in this military action raises questions of racial imbalance that "Black Hawk Down" couldn't even be bothered to acknowledge, let alone answer.

To make some obvious points about Western interests in oil, this picture imitates a few scenes in David O. Russell's remarkable 1999 war picture "Three Kings," where the context was not sacrificed to politics. In "Black Hawk Down," though, the backhanded attempt to provide the most minimal of contexts seems glib, as does Mr. Scott's skillful and facile handling of the action sequences, which supply an undeniably visceral excitement.

The actors are mostly called upon for the kind of "it's a man's man's man's man's world" sloganeering before heading off to fight that characterizes most Bruckheimer films: dated martial wisecracks of the "Let's rock 'n' roll" variety. (When Sean Connery coughed, "Good to go" in "The Rock," it was the death knell of hip-hop as we know it.)

It's tiring to watch the actors, many of whom have appeared spouting these lines in previous Bruckheimer productions, doing the same thing; they're like rowdy guys who were left behind in Movie Star High School. This unintentional repetition fits, since sitting through the accomplished but meaningless "Black Hawk Down" is like being trapped in an action film version of "Groundhog Day," condemned to sit through the same carnage over and over.

"Black Hawk Down" is rated R (Under 17 requires accompanying parent or adult guardian) for a barrage of violence, dismemberment and mayhem, and the usual accompanying panicked strong language.

BLACK HAWK DOWN

Directed by Ridley Scott; written by Ken Nolan, based on the book with that title by Mark Bowden; director of photography, Slawomir Idziak; edited by Pietro Scalia; music by Hans Zimmer; production designer, Arthur Max; produced by Jerry Bruckheimer and Mr. Scott; released by Columbia Pictures. Running time: 143 minutes. This film is rated R.

WITH: Josh Hartnett (Eversmann), Ewan McGregor (Grimes), Tom Sizemore (McKnight), Eric Bana (Hoot), William Fichtner (Sanderson), Ewen Bremner (Nelson), Sam Shepard (Garrison), Gabriel Casseus (Kurth), Kim Coates (Wex), Hugh Dancy (Schmid), Ron Eldard (Durant), Ioan Gruffudd (Beales), Thomas Guiry (Yurek), Charlie Hofheimer (Smith), Danny Hoch (Pilla), Jason Isaacs (Steele), Zeljko Ivanek (Harrell), Glenn Morshower (Matthews), Jeremy Piven (Wolcott), Brendan Sexton III (Kowalewski), Johnny Strong (Shughart), Richard Tyson (Busch) and Orlando Bloom (Blackburn).


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Miscellaneous
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-56 last
To: Pharmboy



"...eye-catching misfire, color-coordinated down ..."


".... Lean, lissome white soldiers ..."


"...teeth pearlier than their eyes ..."


"...their Yankee soldier accents, with vowels so oddly enunciated ..."


"...converts the Somalis into a pack of snarling dark-skinned beasts ..."


"...Intended or not, it reeks of glumly staged racism ..."


".... The only African-American with lines ..."


"...raises questions of racial imbalance ..."


"...dated martial wisecracks of the "Let's rock 'n' roll" ..."


This guy sounds like a racist. Let me guess... he's Black isn't he? Divide the country and disparage anyone in the military. let me guess... Democrat.


41 posted on 12/29/2001 12:12:22 AM PST by vannrox
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lauratealeaf
LL
has BR seen this or plan to see it? I'd like his take on it!!
42 posted on 12/29/2001 12:12:24 AM PST by Betteboop
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pharmboy
Sam Shepard, as Major General Garrison, seems to be smoking a Montecristo No. 2

I like it already - BEST cigars in the world!!!

43 posted on 12/29/2001 12:12:26 AM PST by Jefferson Adams
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pharmboy
In "Black Hawk Down," the lack of characterization converts the Somalis into a pack of snarling dark-skinned beasts, gleefully pulling the Americans from their downed aircraft and stripping them. Intended or not, it reeks of glumly staged racism.

Sounds like it reeks of Truth.

44 posted on 12/29/2001 12:12:26 AM PST by Jefferson Adams
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pharmboy
Elvis focuses obsessively on three things: the film's color scheme, the buffness of the actors (contrasted with an unacceptable level of buffness in one of Mr. Cruise's earlier efforts - thank goodness he shed those nasty pounds later on), and an unappealing racial makeup of the otherwise attractively buff cast. Such penetrating analysis. Evidently this is what it takes to be a NYT film critic.
45 posted on 12/29/2001 12:12:26 AM PST by Jeff F
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mr.Clark
He described it as one long battle, just 90 minutes of pure war.

So I guess the thread with the report from NewsMax.com about the scenes that showed
Bill Clinton in a bad light (just by showing the truth) did end up on the cutting-room floor
(or were never shot).

As far as I'm concerned, if this film didn't spend the last 5-10 minutes on who caused
this mess...and Gordon Shugart's refusal to shake Clintons hand at the medal ceremony
for his son Randall Shugart...I ain't gonna' pay to see this film.
Shame of Jerry Bruckheimer and Ridley Scott. I'll save my money for Mel Gibson's
film "We Were Soldiers" opening March 1, 2002.
46 posted on 12/29/2001 12:12:43 AM PST by VOA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Pharmboy
I suspect Elvis was one of the "journalists" who got to preview the movie and pitched a fit when Clinton came out looking like a bumbling boob. Once the knee-pads are on, I imagine it's deadly to take them off.
47 posted on 12/29/2001 12:12:45 AM PST by hattend
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Asclepius
But this is what actually happened.

When has a Clinton Butt-Boy ever let the facts get in the way of a story.

48 posted on 12/29/2001 12:12:46 AM PST by hattend
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Pharmboy
A GOOD DISCUSSION IS GOING ON HERE
49 posted on 12/29/2001 12:18:23 AM PST by doug from upland
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: doug from upland
Thanks for the link, DFU. I learned some.
50 posted on 12/29/2001 5:12:19 AM PST by Pharmboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: Pharmboy
I saw the first public screening to a packed house in Santa Monica on Friday. The theater was full of film industry people (there definitely is some Best Picture buzz).

The review in Comming Attractions pretty much nailed it. Read the book first(or read most of it in Philly Inquier web site). Definitely go see it. I will pay to see it again when I recover the emotional fortitude.

The fact that the Clinton/Aspin/Powell fiasco is not addressed is IMHO a positive. The focus of the film is the action on the ground in Mog. It would have been a mistake to try to deal with the poll driven politics.

You will be proud of our guys. Can you believe a Santa Monica crowd applauding a war movie? Believe it. Go see it.

51 posted on 12/29/2001 11:17:16 AM PST by robomurph
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: robomurph
Thanks for the Freepview of the flick. It's definitely on my short list.
52 posted on 12/29/2001 7:02:57 PM PST by Pharmboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: kassie
I'd be surprised if the film made any mention of Clinton's phone call to the media which, I have heard, was the cause of these American soldiers being slaughtered. Didn't they land in Somalia only to be greeted by CNN spotlights and, soon after, a "streetdragging" by Somali thugs??
53 posted on 12/30/2001 9:12:19 PM PST by oldlizzie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: oldlizzie
It happened so long ago, but I do remember something of that nature. Was it this time or another one? He was always orchestrating something.
54 posted on 12/31/2001 5:00:46 AM PST by kassie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: robomurph
The fact that the Clinton/Aspin/Powell fiasco is not addressed is IMHO a positive.
The focus of the film is the action on the ground in Mog. It would have been a mistake
to try to deal with the poll driven politics.


(What follows is just my opinion. I respect your position, but honestly approach the
subject of responsibilty over the Somalia imbroglio as follows.)

Funny thing...when the cause of a team's problem is some extra-terrestrial, Ridley Scott
has no problem showing an Alien burst out of somebody's chest.

But...when 18 brave men are sacrificed to a pack of blood-thirsty savages, Ridley and his
buddies decide that they should protect all the folks in the audience from the ugly
truth that many of they are responsible...because they voted for Bill Clinton and his
addled sidekick Les Aspin.
Heck, when they had to do a re-write, they were even willing to waste money to "protect us"
from the truth. Ridley and Bruckheimer would have been excellent workers for Stalin...
editing out unflattering images that would show their Alpha-Male role model in a bad light.
No matter its' technical brilliance, this movie would make a fine "afterword" for that
book on Soviet editing of photographs "The Commissar Vanishes", to show that deception
by deletion marches on.

Just my guess, but I suspect that 9-11 probably caused a scramble to get segments about
Clinton/Aspin out of the film. Scott and Bruckheimer don't want their colleagues in Hollywood
to be muttering behind their backs at cocktail parties "Those two won't ever eat lunch
in this town again. Their movie connected the dots between bin Laden's involvement in
Somalia and Clinton's first failure to actually deal with Osama."

I'm saving my $ for "We Were Soldiers".
55 posted on 12/31/2001 5:30:16 AM PST by VOA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: Pharmboy
Sounds like this guy never saw a war movie he didn't hate. I haven't seen Black Hawk Down yet, but based on this guy's opinion of Gladiator (which I loved), I think it's probably a great film.
56 posted on 12/31/2001 6:12:28 AM PST by 6ppc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-56 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson