Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Afghan official: Convoy had 4 al Qaeda members
cnn.com ^ | December 24, 2001

Posted on 12/24/2001 7:17:14 PM PST by Oliver Optic

Edited on 04/29/2004 1:59:50 AM PDT by Jim Robinson. [history]

KABUL, Afghanistan (CNN) -- A member of Afghanistan's interim government said Monday that four Arab al Qaeda members were in a convoy struck by U.S. warplanes last week.

Amanullah Zadran, minister of border affairs, said Stinger missiles and anti-aircraft weapons were fired from the convoy. U.S. warplanes fired back, Zadran said.


(Excerpt) Read more at cnn.com ...


TOPICS: Breaking News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-34 last
Everytime you invite them Air Force Zoomies and Navy boys over they just wreck the place.

In Desert Storm there was tank plinking, now we have convey plinking.

21 posted on 12/24/2001 8:37:16 PM PST by spectr17
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: spectr17
Dang, but it's fun shootin' at tin cans with a .45-70! The one who makes his can fly the furthrest wins! Doc
22 posted on 12/24/2001 8:43:22 PM PST by Jane G
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: spectr17
This is your vehicle:




This is your vehicle transporting Al Qaeda members:





Any Questions?
23 posted on 12/24/2001 8:47:52 PM PST by coloradan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Jane G
P.S. We never had the fun of plinking with 40 mm depleted uranium schnellfuerers, but it'd be worth re-enlisting just to be able to do so! And on such a marvelous firing range!
24 posted on 12/24/2001 8:51:16 PM PST by Jane G
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Oliver Optic
But, but, but, that is not what Reuters is reporting? < /sarcasm>

Somehow I am not surprised. I had wondered if either this story was entirely false to make the USA look bad, or if the convoy was a mix of Taliban and/of Al Queada and others that were being used for cover, or simply the others still supported the Taliban/Al Queada.

25 posted on 12/24/2001 8:53:53 PM PST by mjaneangels@aolcom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oliver Optic
Amanullah Zadran, minister of border affairs, said Stinger missiles and anti-aircraft weapons were fired from the convoy. U.S. warplanes fired back, Zadran said.

Well, the US finally got someone on the payroll to give the "right" account of what happened. Took a while.

26 posted on 12/24/2001 9:09:27 PM PST by codeword
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KC_Conspirator
Reuters was the lead howling dog on this one. They probably got their story from AIP via Babel Fish.
27 posted on 12/24/2001 9:10:14 PM PST by Righty1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

PULL!!!


28 posted on 12/24/2001 10:06:50 PM PST by spectr17
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Oliver Optic
100 guys in a convoy is not a delegation, it's an army!

If you are a friendly (anti-Taliban), then why carry stingers when the sky only contains friendlies (U.S.)?

Dear media pinheads:

Duh!

29 posted on 12/24/2001 10:08:49 PM PST by fleur-de-lis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oliver Optic
Another member of Afghanistan's interim government had said that the bombing killed delegates traveling to Kabul for the new government's installation.

I guess that this will teach them not to pick up hitch-hikers!

30 posted on 12/24/2001 10:54:28 PM PST by Redcloak
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Righty1
I did see that Reuters, the media outlet that will not call terrorists "terrorists", had about 3-4 stories on this the last couple of days, as if they were to break some huge 'America is very bad' story. If having their own journalists and employees murdered by the Taliban like they were last month, I don't think anything will change their lousy reporting.
31 posted on 12/24/2001 11:54:54 PM PST by KC_Conspirator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: TheOtherOne
I suspected and posted previously that the convoy was likely attempting to move under cover of pretending to be a group of elders heading to the swearing-in ceremony. They may even have been headed there, but it is likely they were going to disrupt the ceremony, possibly going to meet Allah in a great attempt at martyrdom.

It looks as if my suspicions have now been confirmed.

32 posted on 12/25/2001 4:32:24 AM PST by Real Cynic No More
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
I would bet they were going to Kabul to cause trouble!

You think so? Why? Because they were carrying stinger missiles and Anti-aircraft weapons? < /sarcasm>

33 posted on 12/25/2001 4:40:48 AM PST by Go Gordon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Oliver Optic
Why were they shooting at our planes?

In a war zone when you shoot at someone, expect to be see return fire.

34 posted on 12/25/2001 4:58:56 AM PST by chainsaw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-34 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson