[Timmy]

Yeah. Kinda a shame when a law professor knows more about science than the so-called experts. Their only answer? He's a "creationist" and therefore unworthy to have his tough questions addressed. Darwin at least had an excuse, the evidence was still out. However, the rest of you cling to your religion for no apparent reason.

[jlogajan]

Kinda a shame when a law professor knows more about science than the so-called experts.

He indicated no knowledge of science -- but he is a good spinner for the religious cause -- just what we expect of a slippery lawyer.

[mechadogzilla]

Yeah. Kinda a shame when a law professor knows more about science than the so-called experts. Their only answer? He's a "creationist" and therefore unworthy to have his tough questions addressed. Darwin at least had an excuse, the evidence was still out. However, the rest of you cling to your religion for no apparent reason.

A lawyer was able to get O.J. acquitted. I'd expect one to do no less in defense of creationism.