To: Timmy
Kinda a shame when a law professor knows more about science than the so-called experts. He indicated no knowledge of science -- but he is a good spinner for the religious cause -- just what we expect of a slippery lawyer.
8 posted on
12/22/2001 7:32:25 PM PST by
jlogajan
To: jlogajan
He indicated no knowledge of science
Can you support this assertion with substance?
Regards, Exnihilo
10 posted on
12/22/2001 7:34:29 PM PST by
Exnihilo
To: jlogajan
"He indicated no knowledge of science -- but he is a good spinner for the religious cause -- just what we expect of a slippery lawyer." Actually I believe that his legal training makes him MORE qualified to evaluate the quality of the evidence offered in arguments supporting Evolution Theory. He is also adept by training to point out inconsistencies and contradictions that Evolutionary Scientists are prone to ignore.
14 posted on
12/22/2001 7:47:20 PM PST by
NilesJo
To: jlogajan
You are quick to assign a lack of scientific qualifications to Professor Johnson. What, precisely, are your scientific qualifications?
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson