Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

ten Planks of the Communist Manifesto Compared to US LAW
The Net | unknown | unknown

Posted on 12/22/2001 4:59:50 AM PST by DAGO

In the early '60's during the days of the "former" Soviet Union, Russian Premier Nikita Kruschev pounded his shoe on the podium of the United Nations and shouted to the West, "We will bury you!"
Fearing an invasion from the Reds, America proceeded to build the most awesome military machine in history.
Unfortunately, we forgot to guard our political homefront from being taken over by socialist - communist - liberal activists who would gain office and destroy American law by process of gradually installing the Communist agenda within our legal system and separate branches of government.
The Communist program from the start has been one which sees their revolution of 1917 succesful only upon total domination of the world. (See Brain Washing, A Synthesis of the Russian Textbook on Psychopolitics) Americans, being the most naive people among the nations, now believe that Communism is dead because the Berlin Wall and the Iron Curtain have been removed.
The ironic truth is that Communism has just switched names to become more "politically correct". Today it is called international democracy.
The reason that the Berlin Wall came crashing down is not because Communism is dead but because they have achieved the planned agenda to communize the West, including America.
Washington D.C. has indeed become part of the New World Order of atheist governments.

With the last vestiges of Christian law having been removed from "American government" over the last twenty years, there is no longer a threat of resistance against world Communism.
In reality, "American government" became part of the Iron Curtain, thus there was no more need for the likes of a Berlin Wall. Once again, in their foolishness, the American public has believed the lies of their "leaders" who applaud "the fall of Communism", while they have sold out the country to anti-Christian, anti-American statutes and regulations on the federal, state, and local levels.

Posted below is a comparison of the original ten planks of the Communist Manifesto written by Karl Marx in 1848, along with the American adopted counterpart of each of the planks, The American people have truly been "buried in Communism" by their own politicians of both the Republican and Democratic parties. One other thing to remember, Karl Marx was stating in the Communist Manifesto that these planks will test whether a country has become commmunist or not. If they are all in effect and in force the country IS communist. Communism, but by any other name...??

1. Abolition of private property and the application of all rent to public purpose.

The 14th Amendment of the U.S. Constitution (1868), and various zoning, school & property taxes. Also the Bureau of Land Management

2. A heavy progressive or graduated income tax.

Misapplication of the 16th Amendment of the U.S. Constitution, 1913, The Social Security Act of 1936.; Joint House Resolution 192 of 1933; and various State "income" taxes. We call it "paying your fair share".

3. Abolition of all rights of inheritance

We call it Federal & State estate Tax (1916); or reformed Probate Laws, and limited inheritance via arbitrary inheritance tax statutes.

4. Confiscation of the property of all emigrants and rebels

We call in government seizures, tax liens, Public "law" 99-570 (1986); Executive order 11490, sections 1205, 2002 which gives private land to the Department of Urban Development; the imprisonment of "terrorists" and those who speak out or write against the "government" (1997 Crime/Terrorist Bill); or the IRS confiscation of property without due process.

5. Centralization of credit in the hands of the State, by means of a national bank with state capital and an exclusive monopoly.

We call it the Federal Reserve which is a credit/debt system nationally organized by the Federal Reserve act of 1913. All local banks are members of the Fed system, and are regulated by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC). This private bank has an exclusive monopoly in money creation which in reality has ended the need for revenue from taxes. So why do they tax? To FOOL YOU into thinking they need them.

6. Centralization of the means of communication and transportation in the hands of the State

We call it the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) and Department of Transportation (DOT) madated through the ICC act of 1887, the Commissions Act of 1934, The Interstate Commerce Commission established in 1938, The Federal Aviation Administration, Federal Communications Commission, and Executive orders 11490, 10999, as well as State mandated driver's licenses and Department of Transportation regulations. There is also the postal monopoly, AMTRACK and CONRAIL

7. Extention of factories and instruments of production owned by the State, the bringing into cultivation of waste lands, and the improvement of the soil generally in accordance with a common plan.

We call it corporate capacity, The Desert Entry Act and The Department of Agriculture. As well as the Department of Commerce and Labor, Department of Interior, the Evironmental Protection Agency, Bureau of Land Management, Bureau of Reclamation, Bureau of Mines, National Park Service, and the IRS control of business through corporate regulations.

8. Equal liablity of all to labor. Establishment of Industrial armies, especially for agriculture.

We call it the Social Security Administration and The Department of Labor. The National debt and inflation caused by the communal bank has caused the need for a two "income" family. Woman in the workplace since the 1920's, the 19th amendment of the U.S. Constitution, the Civil Rights Act of 1964, assorted Socialist Unions, affirmative action, the Federal Public Works Program and of course Executive order 11000. And I almost forgot...The Equal Rights Amendment means that women should do all work that men do including the military and since passage it would make women subject to the draft.

9. Combination of agriculture with manufacturing industries; gradual abolition of the distinction between town and country by a more equable distribution of the population over the country.

We call it the Planning Reorganization act of 1949 , zoning (Title 17 1910-1990) and Super Corporate Farms, as well as Executive orders 11647, 11731 (ten regions) and Public "law" 89-136.

10. Free education for all children in government schools. Abolition of children's factory labor in its present form. Combination of education with industrial production, etc. etc.

People are being taxed to support what we call 'public' schools, which train the young to work for the communal debt system. We also call it the Department of Education, the NEA and Outcome Based "Education" .

So I ask you...does changing the words, change the end result? By using different words is it all of a sudden OK????? We are so "smart," aren't we?? "None are more hopelessly enslaved, as those who falsely believe they are free.... COMRADE DAGOSAVITCH COMMUNIST AGENT OCCUPIED USSA


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Editorial
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-44 next last
I know Im just a conspiracy nut case.Hope santa brings me a tin foil deflecto shield.
1 posted on 12/22/2001 4:59:50 AM PST by DAGO
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: DAGO

"We the people of the United States, in order to form a more
perfect union, establish justice, insure domestic tranquility,
provide for the common defense, promote the general welfare,
and secure the blessings of liberty to ourselves and our
posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the
United States of America.
"

I'm always amazed at the suggestion that our forefathers did not
believe this country should provide certain benefits to all, for the
good of all, at the expense of all.

To form a union [group; society] and provide help as a whole to
all that live as part of our union, is fairly clear in the preamble.

It's the exaggeration of the intent; the providing of certain "benefits"
that do not truly of benefit all citizens. It is the providing of certain
services that are not promoting the general welfare, but only the
bank accounts of those distributing those "benefits" [ala' Joe Kennedy
and Mass Oil], that we lose sight of our Constitution's intent.

But to claim that "public schooling", "the food and drug industry",
or other matters of concern [environmental] that effect our entire
Nation's welfare in it's whole, should be exempted from control;
that it is "socialistic" to put any control upon it, is sheer folly.

You can't guarantee our Constitution's intent if you disregard
it's intent.

 

2 posted on 12/22/2001 5:42:22 AM PST by Deep_6
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Deep_6
I would argue the Public Schooling is not something the Federal Government should be involved in. Each State should be free to set their own standards and controls for their own schools.
3 posted on 12/22/2001 6:04:42 AM PST by DrDavid
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Deep_6
Nice try, but no cigar. "Nation's welfare" -- ? "General welfare" -- ? It's all the same indigestible nonsense.

The "general welfare," the phrase most usually seized upon by social-welfare-fascists to justify their incursions on freedom, has only one conceivable meaning: the defense of all rights to life, liberty and property. Once you try to interpret the phrase as a license to invade any individual's rights, or the rights of any group of individuals however defined, for the benefit of some other group, be it larger or smaller, you have excluded the victimized group from the "general welfare."

Not one of the Framers would have approved of any of the things you appear to want to justify, except that Jefferson would have approved of government-run schools. (All right, the man was a genius, but he was wrong now and then, too.) An income tax? Zoning? Laws that dictate who may sell what, and what standards it must meet? Not a chance. Those were the precise things they rebelled against England for imposing upon them.

You don't think so? Look it up. Look up the Pine Tree Act. Look up the various acts that forbade Americans to trade with non-English firms on any basis. As for government-run schools, all but Jefferson would have shied back in horror, noting immediately that no other conceivable organ of State propaganda could possibly be as effective at producing docile and submissive subjects as a State school.

Let's have an end to this "general welfare" BS. There are only individuals and their rights. Trample anyone's rights -- which do NOT include a right to anything that belongs to any other man, nor a right to anything that someone else must produce for him -- and you lose the entire point of the American Constitutional enterprise.

Freedom, Wealth, and Peace,
Francis W. Porretto
Visit the Palace Of Reason: http://palaceofreason.com

4 posted on 12/22/2001 6:14:44 AM PST by fporretto
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Kentucky Woman
A 'New Deal' on the American Laws that are on the books - BUMP !!
5 posted on 12/22/2001 6:17:04 AM PST by Alabama_Wild_Man
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #6 Removed by Moderator

To: Alabama_Wild_Man
BUMP
7 posted on 12/22/2001 6:25:59 AM PST by Native American Female Vet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: DAGO
I don't have a source for this but I believe its real. I think you can check about 3/4's of the items on this list.

1963 Communist Goals

1)US acceptance of coexistence as the only alternative to atomic war.

2)US willingness to capitulate in preference to engaging in atomic war.

3) Develop the illusion that total disarmament by the US would be a demonstration of "moral strength".

4) Permit free trade between all nations regardless of Communist affiliation and regardless of whether or not items could be used for war. 5) Extension of long term loans to Russia and Soviet Satellites.

6) Provide American aid to all nations regardless of Communist domination.

7) Grant recognition of Red China, and admission of Red China to the UN.

8) Set up East and West Germany as separate states in spite of Khrushchev's promise in 1955 to settle the Germany question by free elections under supervision of the UN.

9) Prolong the conferences to ban atomic tests because the US has agreed to suspend tests as long as negotiations are in progress.

10) Allow all Soviet Satellites individual representation in the UN.

11) Promote the UN as the only hope for mankind. If its charter is rewritten, demand that it be set up as a one world government with its own independent armed forces. (Some Communist leaders believe the world can be taken over as easily by the UN as by Moscow. Sometimes these two centers compete with each other as they are now doing in the Congo.

12) Resist any attempt to outlaw the Communist Party.

13) Do away with loyalty oaths.

14) Continue giving Russia access to the US Patent Office.

15) Capture one or both of the political parties in the US.

16) Use technical decisions of the courts to weaken basic American institutions, by claiming their activities violate civil rights.

17) Get control of the schools. Use them as transmission belts for Socialism, and current Communist propaganda. Soften the curriculum. Get control of teachers associations. Put the party line in text books.

18) Gain control of all student newspapers.

19) Use student riots to foment public protests against programs or organizations which are under Communist attack. 20) Infiltrate the press. Get control of book review assignments, editorial writing, policy-making positions.

21) Gain control of key positions in radio, TV & motion pictures.

22) Continue discrediting American culture by degrading all form of artistic expression. An American Communist cell was told to "eliminate all good sculpture from parks and buildings", substitute shapeless,awkward, and meaningless forms.

23) Control art critics and directors of art museums. " Our plan is to promote ugliness, repulsive, meaningless art".

24) Eliminate all laws governing obscenity by calling them "censorship" and a violation of free speech and free press.

25) Break down cultural standards of morality by promoting pornography, and obscenity in books, magazines, motion pictures, radio and TV.

26) Present Homosexuality, degeneracy, and promiscuity as "normal, natural, and healthy".

27) Infiltrate the churches and replace revealed religion with "social" religion. Discredit the Bible and emphasize the need for intellectual maturity, which does not need a "religious crutch".

28) Eliminate prayer or any phase of religious expression in the schools on the grounds that it violates the principle of "separation of church and state".

29) Discredit the American Constitution by calling it inadequate, old fashioned, out of step with modern needs, a hindrance to cooperation between nations on a worldwide basis.

30) Discredit the American founding fathers. Present them as selfish aristocrats who had no concern for the "common man".

31) Belittle all forms of American culture and discourage the teaching of American history on the ground that it was only a minor part of "the big picture:" Give more emphasis to Russian history since the Communists took over.

32) Support any socialist movement to give centralized control over any part of the culture - - education, social agencies, welfare programs, mental health clinics, etc. 33) Eliminate all laws or procedures, which interfere with the operation of the Communist apparatus.

34) Eliminate the House Committee on Un-American Activities.

35) Discredit and eventually dismantle the FBI.

36) Infiltrate and gain control of more unions.

37) Infiltrate and gain control of big business.

38) Transfer some of the powers of arrest from the police to social agencies. Treat all behavioral problems as psychiatric disorders which no one but psychiatrists can understand or treat.

39) Dominate the psychiatric profession and use mental health laws as a means of gaining coercive control over those who oppose Communist goals.

40) Discredit the family as an institution. Encourage promiscuity and easy divorce.

41) Emphasize the need to raise children away from the negative influence of parents.

Attribute prejudices, mental blocks and retarding of children to suppressive influence of parents.

42) Create the impression that violence and insurrection are legitimate aspects of the American tradition; that students and special interest groups should rise up and make a "united force" to solve economic, political,or social problems.

43) Overthrow all colonial governments before native populations are ready for self-government.

44) Internationalize the Panama Canal.

45) Repeal the Connally Reservation so the US can not prevent the World Court from seizing jurisdiction over domestic problems. Give the World Court jurisdiction over domestic problems. Give the World Court jurisdiction over nations and individuals alike.

8 posted on 12/22/2001 6:47:16 AM PST by Tunehead54
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tunehead54
We are allowing communists into our government, who incorporate the communist party plank into government offices and jobs paid for by tax dollars. All the efforts in the 30's, 40's and 50's to fight the communist infiltration of our government is lost. If you don't think this is a big deal, you are mistaken. They are in the government and they are stealing our freedom by changing the intent of these government agencies and using them as tools to promote the communist agenda.

The definition of environmental justice can be found in the communist party platform, the socialist party platform and the green party platform. Environmental justice definitions have worked their way into the EPA, the Dept of Agriculture, the California State Land Use and planning office and the California state resources board,CERES. Environmental justice is anti-American,anti-property rights and anti-freedom. Our law and government offices are NO PLACE for communist party platforms or agendas. This is one of the reasons you Klamath farmers are having such a hard time getting fair treatment from the government

In 1994 Bill Clinton signed an executive order making the communist plank of environmental justice part of our federal government.

FEDERAL ACTIONS TO ADDRESS ENVIRONMENTAL JUSTICE IN MINORITY POPULATIONS AND LOW-INCOME POPULATIONS
9 posted on 12/22/2001 7:01:12 AM PST by hedgetrimmer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Tunehead54
Can ANYBODY still doubt that our Constitutional Republic has been and continues to be eroded from within by Communist principles? All we need to is to look at the ACLU, the NEA (National Extortion..err...Education Association), the Federal Reserve and the other hosts of subversive agencies who are allowed to set policies affecting the citizens of this Country. When the government can tell us when our children must begin and MAY end attendence in the public indoctrination centers called schools, when they can tell the public that they must "accept" and help fund personally disagreeable policies, when they can rob the fruits of an individual's labors then, we are longer truely a free free people but are, instead, laboring under an illusion of freedom.

This Country was founded under the ideals of everyone having the OPPORTUNITY to provide form themselves and their families, not on the premise that the "public" would provide support for same. Thing is, now those that ARE willing to work are having their labors confiscated to provide for those who will not and, historically, private enterprise (churches, charitable organizations) provided for those who COULD NOT. The premise of "from each according to his ability, to each according to his needs" is the problem we are burdened with today by (what is supposed to be) OUR government and is rooted in communism.

When the government fears the people, there is freedom. When the people fear the government, there is tyranny. Tell me who ISN'T afraid of the IRS, the BATF, the BLM, etc., etc., who may have reason to cross paths with them and we'll find out pretty quickly who fears whom.

10 posted on 12/22/2001 7:07:03 AM PST by KentuckyWoman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Deep_6
But to claim that "public schooling", "the food and drug industry", or other matters of concern [environmental] that effect our entire Nation's welfare in it's whole, should be exempted from control; that it is "socialistic" to put any control upon it, is sheer folly

Interesting that you should bring up 'public schooling' because it was not in the Founders' intent and was not established until 1867, and the passage of the infamous 14th Amendment, which also BTW destroyed the rights of the states requiring elected officials to recognize Almighty God(as outlined in many state constitutions). The only place federally funded schooling had ever been mentioned before this time was in the Northwest Ordinance and was mainly aimed at Indian children to teach them English

11 posted on 12/22/2001 7:18:08 AM PST by billbears
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: DAGO
Shhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh...

None of this matters. We have a REPUBLICAN in the White House. :)

12 posted on 12/22/2001 9:22:43 AM PST by DAnconia55
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KentuckyWoman
"When the government fears the people, there is freedom. When the people fear the government, there is tyranny."

WOW!!!!!!Very wise words!!!!

COMRADE DAGOSAVITCH
COMMUNIST AGENT
OCCUPIED USSA

13 posted on 12/22/2001 12:50:40 PM PST by DAGO
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Deep_6
Are you sugesting the CONSTITUTION itself is COMMUNIST?
14 posted on 12/22/2001 12:53:22 PM PST by DAGO
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Tunehead54
Iv got that bookmarked.
15 posted on 12/22/2001 12:54:12 PM PST by DAGO
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: fporretto
re:
"..Visit the Palace Of Reason.."

BWAHAHAHAA

Thanks for the laugh.

And wonderful insight also, that anyone [like Jefferson] that
disagrees with your purported vast knowledge of our
forefather's intent, is an idiot. [palace of reason....hahaha]

Rather than purported, it is perverted; twisted, your assumption
that the requiring of standards of quality should be deemed
"unconstitutional". I would agree [as I stated], that there has been
an exaggeration of the intent, but the basis is on solid ground.

I said:
"..It's the exaggeration of the intent; the providing of certain "benefits"
that do not truly of benefit all citizens. It is the providing of certain
services that are not promoting the general welfare, but only the
bank accounts of those distributing those "benefits" [ala' Joe Kennedy
and Mass Oil], that we lose sight of our Constitution's intent
....."

You apparently missed that?

And this continual denouncing of the concept of public schooling;
the concept that all public schools conform to universal standards
of required study to provide each American child with an equal
opportunity to succeed, is ludicrous. It serves only to give
"conservatives" the appearance of being self-serving and careless
of concern for this Nation's future.

No child or person should be given benefit over another and
neither should be denied benefit. To demand universal and
conformed educational process of our public schooling, is the
correct action; you are free to pay for any other private education
you may prefer.

And there should be the teaching of Constitutional rights in
our schools. If that includes the teaching of the wrongness
of prejudicial attitudes, it is conforming closer to the teaching
of the Constitutional rights of others, than your idea of what
should be taught.

 

Thanks.

16 posted on 12/22/2001 8:02:38 PM PST by Deep_6
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: billbears
re:
"..the passage of the infamous 14th Amendment, which also
BTW destroyed the rights of the states requiring elected officials
to recognize Almighty God
...."

Once an Amendment is passed, it is as much of our Constitution
than the original script, and is to be assumed as valid. [see amendment
1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9 etc]

Secondly..

Our Constitution says quite clearly:

[Article 6]
"...The Senators and Representatives before mentioned, and the
members of the several state legislatures, and all executive and
judicial officers, both of the United States and of the several states,
shall be bound by oath or affirmation, to support this Constitution;
but no religious test shall ever be required as a qualification to any
office or public trust under the United States
....."

Our forefathers saw fit to make certain, religion and matters of State
were as far separate as possible. Since our Constitution is precedent
over State's rights, it is all encompassing. A state's legislation cannot
supercede a Constitutional mandate. A state cannot require "elected
officials to recognize Almighty God
". To do so would be unconstitutional.

Although I'm as unhappy with the state of public schooling as anyone
else, I rather demand it is fixed and restored, not torn apart and
abandoned for a less universal approach.

 

Thanks.

17 posted on 12/22/2001 8:17:09 PM PST by Deep_6
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Deep_6
Interesting that you should say that. I would refer you to the constitutions of Missouri, North Carolina, South Carolina, Virginia, and Massachusetts just to name a few. All of those constitutions required said affirmation. Only until the 14th Amendment destroyed those states' rights(which the War of Southern Independence was fought over) did such 'tests' as you call them become outlawed. Jefferson himself in several letters to those of his home state and as noted in the Anti-Federalist papers recommended that states establish said church as was predominant in their population
18 posted on 12/22/2001 9:05:25 PM PST by billbears
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Deep_6
Tennessee; Article VIII, Section 2 (1796) ". . . no person who denies the being of God, or a future state of rewards and punishments, shall hold any office in the civil department of this State ."

Vermont; Declaration of Rights, III (1777) " . . . nor can any man who professes the protestant religion, be justly deprived or abridged of any civil right, as a citizen, on account of his religious sentiment . . . ; nevertheless, every sect or denomination of people ought to observe the Sabbath, or the Lord's day . . . "

Vermont; Frame of Government, Section 9 (1777) "And each member [of the legislature], . . . shall make and subscribe the following declaration, viz.: 'I do believe in one god, the Creator and Governor of the universe, the rewarder of the good and punisher of the wicked. And I do acknowledge the scriptures of the old and new testament to be given by divine inspiration, and own and profess the protestant religion .'"

"Providence has given to our people the choice of their rulers, and it is the duty as well as the privilege and interest of our Christian nation to select and prefer Christians for their rulers." --John Jay, first Chief Justice of the U.S. Supreme Court

Just a few from Vermont and Tennessee. There are plenty more and most, if not all, stood as requirements until your glorious 14th Amendment

19 posted on 12/22/2001 9:25:39 PM PST by billbears
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Deep_6
And wonderful insight also, that anyone [like Jefferson] that disagrees with your purported vast knowledge of our forefather's intent, is an idiot. [palace of reason....hahaha]

You're a real rhetorical muscleman, aren't you? Someone disagrees with you, and you immediately start calling names and putting words into other people's mouths. You must have been a real delight in the schoolyard at recess.

As for your claim that "the basis is on solid ground," I have two suggestions:

Of course, it's possible that you've merely misunderstood the impact of the Preamble to the Constitution, which a) awards no powers to any branch of government, b) speaks of a body of general desiderata in extremely flowery language, c) has been deemed by Constitutional scholars throughout history to be merely decorative. You wouldn't be the first.

As for the phrase "general welfare" in Article I, James Madison himself, the Father of the Constitution, wrote that the import of that phrase was circumscribed by the seventeen specifically awarded powers of Section 8. At the time of the Framing, there were no dissents from that view among the Framers. You can look that up too.

It serves only to give "conservatives" the appearance of being self-serving and careless of concern for this Nation's future.

Conservatives careless about the direction of America's future? Are you sure you're on the right discussion board? The URL for Democratic Underground is http://www.democraticunderground.com. Glad to be of service.

Freedom, Wealth, and Peace,
Francis W. Porretto
Visit the Palace Of Reason: http://palaceofreason.com

20 posted on 12/23/2001 3:09:11 AM PST by fporretto
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-44 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson