Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

ChiComs sold weapons to Al Quieda after 9/11
Wash Times ^ | Gertz

Posted on 12/21/2001 7:25:53 AM PST by francisandbeans

Edited on 07/12/2004 3:36:28 PM PDT by Jim Robinson. [history]

China continued to supply arms to Osama bin Laden's al Qaeda terrorist even after the group began the September 11 attack on America, says a senior U.S. official.

The official said that a week after the terrorist attack, the ruling Taliban and the al Qaeda fighters embedded among them, received a shipment of Chinese-made SA-7 missiles. The shoulder-fired anti-aircraft weapons are similar to the U.S. Stinger.


(Excerpt) Read more at washingtontimes.com ...


TOPICS: Breaking News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-63 next last

1 posted on 12/21/2001 7:25:53 AM PST by francisandbeans
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: francisandbeans
Boycott all Chinese products.
2 posted on 12/21/2001 7:28:53 AM PST by isthisnickcool
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: francisandbeans
While this is certainly possible I think it is more likely the case that the Islamics in China got a hold of these weapons through rogue Chinese elements and sold them to Al Qaeda.
3 posted on 12/21/2001 7:30:05 AM PST by Lent
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: francisandbeans
Can it be that the ChiComs hate us almost as much as Al Quieda?
4 posted on 12/21/2001 7:36:48 AM PST by Destructor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: francisandbeans
Curious that the 'official' is never named or his position in the government even mentioned. Makes me wonder how 'official' he was.
5 posted on 12/21/2001 7:36:52 AM PST by RussianBear716
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RussianBear716
Maybe it was his mailman
6 posted on 12/21/2001 7:38:27 AM PST by francisandbeans
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Lent
No, what happened is that China sells ammo to absolutely anyone, anywhere. The US is full of private citizens with basements full of Chinese ammo; so are Pakistani arms markets. And dozens upon dozens of countries have SA-7s. You don't need to spefically be given this stuff by the PRC to get it.

Gertz is revealed as a DEBKA-spouting complete moron in this article and it's an embarassment for Drudge that this is his headline, and an embarassment for FR that so many people are unquestioningly accepting the article.

7 posted on 12/21/2001 7:39:18 AM PST by John H K
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: francisandbeans
Some More Comments On The Same Article
8 posted on 12/21/2001 7:40:25 AM PST by eureka!
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: John H K
For purpose of trying to understand where you're coming from in trashing Gertz here and on the other thread,could you give us all the readers digest version of your overall thinking on China and its goals?
9 posted on 12/21/2001 7:44:19 AM PST by John W
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: francisandbeans
Why doesn't this surprise me?
10 posted on 12/21/2001 7:44:44 AM PST by Salvation
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: francisandbeans
Another theory floating around is that the ChiComs are buying off al Queda in order to keep them from causing trouble among Muslim militants in China's border province of Xinjiang Uygur. This was reported several weeks ago, but I can't find the source, and it was likely just speculation.

From the BBC: China clampdown on Muslim region

11 posted on 12/21/2001 7:48:18 AM PST by kezekiel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Destructor
The time has come for America to recognize UNILATERALLY TAIWAN as a FREE and INDEPENDENT NATION!!! I would further urge that America ENOURAGE the Chinese provinces BORDERRING NORTH KOREA to REVOLT!!!! the sooner the better!!!.. China as a nation has forfietted its right to EXIST!!!
12 posted on 12/21/2001 7:52:02 AM PST by Roger_W_Isom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: francisandbeans
Well, that puts us at war with China, technically.

What in hell's name will we do, what with the US-China business community firmly entrenched, and in control of the levers of power at the White House, State and Congress. Seems like DOD and CIA will be the only areas willing to stand up to the PRC.

You are right, there needs to be a national campaign now for a SERIOUS boycotting of Chinese products and a campaign of harassment against their PLA-trading firms in the US, who stand squarely in the camp of wanting to murder US troops on the field. How can we wave and salute the American flag at Walmart and then go down the aisle and fund the PRC through purchases that then go on to target our very servicemen in the field.

What a great, timely article!!

13 posted on 12/21/2001 7:52:39 AM PST by AmericanInTokyo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: francisandbeans
Let's examine this story.

What is the shipping time from China to whereever it is that Al Quieda received the arms.

The official said that a week after the terrorist attack, the ruling Taliban and the al Qaeda fighters embedded among them, received a shipment of Chinese-made SA-7 missiles. The shoulder-fired anti-aircraft weapons are similar to the U.S. Stinger.

Book the vessel - one week ahead of time (minimum).
Shipment to the port in China - 3 days ahead of sailing (minimum).
Sailing time to Afghanistan - one week (minimum).
Clearance at the delivering port - 3 days minimum.

Let's rewrite the story to make it accurate.

The official said that 3 weeks (minimum) before the terrorist attack, the ruling Taliban and the al Qaeda fighters embedded among them, ordered a shipment of Chinese-made SA-7 missiles. The shoulder-fired anti-aircraft weapons which are similar to the U.S. Stinger, arrived in Afghanistan one week after the terrorist attack.

Not nearly so exciting, is it, but it is a whole lot more accurate. As originally written, the story is deceptive - purposely so. Now look at the lead.

The lead says China continued to supply arms after the September 11 attack. Using a anology of a hose and water, the water might still have been coming out of the end of the hose even if the valve was turned off after the attacks occured. Is this continuing to supply?

You have to read with a very critical eye. This story is purposely deceptive. The writer certainly knew the shipping times involved. The story was written for the maximum sales benefit while still remaining literally correct.

And they say the China Daily is full of propoganda.

14 posted on 12/21/2001 7:55:20 AM PST by BJungNan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: John W
China is a horrible communist dictatorship that would like to expand its sphere of influence, but one that faces severe internal instability problems.

China also has a badly overhyped military at the moment. Problem is, you don't get a balanced view of their military problems from Bill Gertz, Newsmax, etc. etc.; everything is absurd hype based on the latest superweapon of the week they've bought from somebody, or some cockamamie article about how they've taken over somewhere in some nefarious plot.

The various military analysts popular with the right overhype the PRC just as much as the left overhyped the Taliban and the Iraqi Republican Guard. The negatives about their military forces are swept under the rug.

They don't have the capability to do pretty much any of the things they'd like to do...they can't invade Taiwan, etc. They don't have 600,000 troops in the Sudan. And they don't control the Panama Canal.

Pointing out the Chinese are overrated and they aren't behind all evil in the world doesn't mean I support the PRC. Far from it.

I suspect the Communist government collapses a la Eastern Europe in 1989, within 5-7 years or so. Worry is China descending into warlordism again, though.

15 posted on 12/21/2001 7:55:33 AM PST by John H K
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: francisandbeans
Defense Secretary Donald H. Rumsfeld says Chinese have been found fighting among al Qaeda.

When did he say this???

16 posted on 12/21/2001 7:57:18 AM PST by cactmh
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: isthisnickcool
Recently I needed a pair of work gloves. Whenever I buy anything, I look carefully at the label and have not bought Chinese in 15 years.

Although the gloves which were made in America cost $6 more than a comparable Chinese version, I happily paid the extra money rather than finance those scalawags, the Chicoms.

The Chinese are a great people and deserve a decent government. It will happen when the next generation takes power. China has always been one generation behing the Russians.

17 posted on 12/21/2001 7:57:19 AM PST by CROSSHIGHWAYMAN
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: BJungNan
There's a port in Afghanistan?
18 posted on 12/21/2001 7:58:45 AM PST by cactmh
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: CROSSHIGHWAYMAN
One argument says that economic success and capitalism will quickly evolve China, so if you buy that argument, you should BUY CHINESE! :)
19 posted on 12/21/2001 8:00:09 AM PST by cactmh
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: francisandbeans
"The official said that a week after the terrorist attack, the ruling Taliban and the al Qaeda fighters embedded among them, received a shipment of Chinese-made SA-7 missiles."

What "official?" From what country? While it's certainly possible that arms were shipped directly to Afghanistan from China, the article only implicates the PLA by innuendo. It's more likely - much more likely - that the arms were smuggled from China by profiteers or trans-shipped from another Moslem country. The trans-shipping of military arms is an on-going problem even for American made materials.

No matter how much I respect Gertz's work... this is one of the poorest examples of journalism that I've ever seen him produce... especially given the gravity of the accusation. If the Chinese kleptocracy knowingly - intentionally - supplied arms to al Queada after 9/11, then somebody is going to have to prove it. You don't send boys off to die in a war over rumors and anonymous tips.

20 posted on 12/21/2001 8:01:19 AM PST by Harrison Bergeron
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-63 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson