302 reports may or may not be accurate representations of some things said by those interviewed but they are never complete or reliable, are not "witness reports" and are not evidence of what was said or wasnt said.
You did not support your allegation that some of the FBI's 302's are bogus with any evidence or reference source URL's. Can you? If so, please extend the readers the courtesy of doing so.
"The fact is that the only "expert witness report analyst"s that have analyzed the reports are FBI analysts who would be unlikely to undermine their employers assertions."
Not so. Click here.
"You challenge people to fit eyewitness reports into the big boom... but those very reports are taken from the flawed 302s. GARBAGE IN, GARBAGE OUT... especially if the garbage was manufactured to fit one scenario, the official one."
The "big boom" Massive Fireball explosion was by far the most dramatic of the rapid fire sequence of fiery events in the sky and it was seen by virtually all of the witnesses including those who did not see the immediately preceding fiery streak. Expert witness interviewers know the importance of getting oriented to where and when the major events took place. Others don't. But Kallstrom succumbed at the outset to his knee jerk reaction that zoom+boom=missile shootdown and on that basis alone sought and got authority from Louis Freeh, Janet Reno and the White House to conduct a criminal investigation of the disaster and seize control from the NTSB, thereafter wasting the better part of $40,000,000 in his wild goose chase.
The tinfoil hatters had the same knee jerk reaction that zoom+boom=missile shootdown as dramatized by the graphics they came up with, such as the following that appeared in most if not all of their websites in which the unmistakable "big boom" Massive Fireball explosion immediately follows the fiery streak.
Please extend the readers the courtesy of quoting from The "Missile Witnesses" Myth what you relied on for your allegation that it was based on FBI 302 reports.