[Mitchell]

This must be the man they're talking about in the other story (since all the particulars match in detail), but he's very unlikely to be the anthrax mailer because the dates aren't right.

The article says he was interviewed by the Milwaukee police on Sept. 18, apparently in Milwaukee. That is the postmark date of the letters to the NY Post and Tom Brokaw, postmarked Trenton, NJ. These letters were not mailed from Milwaukee (in addition to the postmark evidence, note that there's no trail of anthrax spores or anthrax infections in Milwaukee).

Sept. 18 was a Tuesday, so the letters were presumably mailed either on Tuesday itself or after the last pick-up time on Monday. Unless this scientist had just returned to Milwaukee from out of town either on Sept. 18 or late on Sept. 17, this just doesn't make sense.

[Clinton's a rapist]

Interesting that they should recycle this old red herring and turn it into the centerpiece of the lastest FBI spin. Guess they forgot that there are people out here who know how to use Google. (Incidentally, the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel story is the only report that turned up, so this one was almost down the memory hole.) If you read the ABC News story without knowing the background, you would really think they were onto something. Oh, well...

[Alamo-Girl]

Great catch, Mitchell! Thanks for the heads up!!!