Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Homosexual rights group intolerant of Salvation Army
Washington Times - Letter to the Editor ^ | Decemnber 16, 2001 | Regina Griggs

Posted on 12/16/2001 12:49:18 PM PST by FormerLib

Edited on 07/12/2004 3:36:27 PM PDT by Jim Robinson. [history]

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-64 next last
To: Ruggers
Plenty of normal, healthy, religious people, myself included, are not fundamentalists.

Same here.

We love normal religion and spirituality. We wish to help those who feel compelled to "talk in tongues", writhe around on the floor...

Well, I certainly do find that all quite strange as well.

...and write incessant, never ceasing anti-gay rhetoric on internet bulletin boards.

Ah, I see! More bigotry against those who dare to challenge the virulent homosexual agenda. Gee, all that nice rhetoric exposed by the nonsensical "anti-gay" behavior. Who could possible be against anyone simply being lighthearted?

Oh wait, that isn't what you meant, is it. You meant that we shouldn't speak out against the sinful behavior known as homosexuality, don't you. Well sorry, chum, but we have the right of free speech and religion as well.

There is a way out, you know.

We keep telling them that but some really evil people keep trying to keep the poor homosexuals trapped in their sinful behavior. Can you imagine someone hating someone else so much that they could do that do them? I certainly can't.

Blessings on you. I pray you overcome your illness.

Why thank you for your concern, however, the doctor tells me that most colds such as this run their course in a week or so.

21 posted on 12/16/2001 2:51:01 PM PST by FormerLib
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Utah Girl; anniegetyourgun; WriteOn; Mr.Clark; Hacksaw; OldFriend; zandtar; VaBthang4...
A Salvation Army ping for decency!
22 posted on 12/16/2001 3:01:00 PM PST by FormerLib
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #23 Removed by Moderator

To: FormerLib
I do hope that you can someday overcome your anti-religious bigotry.

I am reaching, but just can't grasp the love, is it me?

24 posted on 12/16/2001 3:02:31 PM PST by TightSqueeze
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

Comment #25 Removed by Moderator

To: Ruggers;FormerLib
knock it off
26 posted on 12/16/2001 3:13:26 PM PST by Admin Moderator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: FormerLib
Support the Salvation Army Bump!!


" A Closer Look at P-FLAG":

"This supposedly mainstream organization is not what appearances suggest..."

27 posted on 12/16/2001 4:27:05 PM PST by EdReform
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #28 Removed by Moderator

To: FormerLib
We need for someone to post the Salvation Army address again so that people can send them donations. Anybody?
29 posted on 12/16/2001 4:58:01 PM PST by Bigg Red
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sueann
Re your # 11: Why do you call them "Gay"?....They are really quite SAD.
30 posted on 12/16/2001 4:58:38 PM PST by rmvh
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: FormerLib
Same here. Plus, I love the fact that some organizations have already announced they will 'buy back' any of the bogus money by swapping it for the real thing. This is starting to backfire on the sodomites in a big, big way.

It is such a good idea that my church has asked our friends at the Salvation Army to collect all the bogus bills they get, turn them over to us, and we'll double the face value in real money. An attempt will be made to get this into the newspaper, when all is said and done.

31 posted on 12/16/2001 5:52:14 PM PST by Migraine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: rmvh
"They are really sad"

Yes, you are right about that!

32 posted on 12/16/2001 5:53:15 PM PST by Sueann
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Ruggers
On the other hand, we have the right to criticize your constgant attempts to distort and pervert religion in the name of continuing your pride in a sinful lifestyle and your attempts to distort the meaning of medical terms.

Firmly believing in the Word of God is not pathological, but sticking your member up another man's butt is, as demonstrated by the diseases that result. God made the plumbing and gifted us with it; there is nothing in the Bible, contrary to the constant assertions of the purveyors of the homosexual agenda, that justifies the misuse of it. It is your flaunting as illustrated by your half-clever statement that condemns you even more than your original sin.

33 posted on 12/16/2001 6:27:56 PM PST by AmericanVictory
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Jester99
. I still don't see why they had any success with their lies about AIDS and how everyone is at risk, but a lot of people bought it.

It also seems to me that some homosexual groups are deliberately trying to increase the risk of other people getting AIDS by e.g. encouraging people who are at high risk for AIDS to donate blood while lying about their risk factors. I don't know how widespread this is, but 'despicable' just doesn't seem a harsh enough word to describe it.

34 posted on 12/16/2001 8:37:59 PM PST by supercat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: FormerLib
Oh wait, that isn't what you meant, is it. You meant that we shouldn't speak out against the sinful behavior known as homosexuality, don't you. Well sorry, chum, but we have the right of free speech and religion as well.

Sorry FormerLib, but according to most of the extereme leftie groups, everyone else is supposed to be tolerant of them, but not vice versa. At least the American public is starting to wake up to this fact and rebel against this, and demand that everyone be treated equally.

I think the kicker is how the groups protesting against the Salvation Army are saying how the Salvation Army isn't doing what it's supposed to do. Uh, excuse me, you're now running the organization? Gee, lets start protesting AT&T for not providing video conferencing to everyone for free. They usually give themselves enough rope to hang themselves with their own hypocracy, if anyone bothers to point it out to them. They're supposed to have the right to live however they wish, or with whatever lifestyle they choose. Okay, fine with me, it's still America and it's still the land of the free. However, they also seem to insist that if anyone opts to not choose to support that lifestyle of theirs, they should be forced to. Of course, if anyone did the same thing against their cause, they'd be crying "Hate Crime" all the way to the police.

I'm not anti-gay, in that I don't believe they should be killed, beaten, etc.. or be stripped of the rights every American citizen is given. However, I am against such causes like this where they want to force-feed their lifestype choices upon those who do not wish to support it, while expecting federal protection if anyone does the reverse to them. To me, that is the disgusting part of all of this, the standard liberal double-standard "freedom of speech and choice for me, but not for thee" attitude.

35 posted on 12/17/2001 3:01:58 AM PST by zandtar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: FormerLib
"WE'RE HETERO"

"WE'LL NEVER GO"

"GET USED TO IT"

36 posted on 12/17/2001 3:46:53 AM PST by Looking4Truth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ruggers
We're just telling you there is a way out of the pathological lifestyle of fundamentalism.

And if I were a fundamentalist, that might be relevant. I'm not and it isn't.

There is a way out of the destructive morass that is moral relativistic liberalism!

Merry Christmas to you and yours!

37 posted on 12/17/2001 4:35:12 AM PST by FormerLib
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: TightSqueeze
I am reaching, but just can't grasp the love, is it me?

The liberal disruptor is the most difficult creature to love, but we must still try. If we fail, we must try again.

38 posted on 12/17/2001 4:36:21 AM PST by FormerLib
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: supercat
It also seems to me that some homosexual groups are deliberately trying to increase the risk of other people getting AIDS...

That was the direct motivation for the dentist who deliberately infected several of his patients, Kimberly Bergalis being one of them. He thought more people would care about AIDS if it started to get into the heterosexual population, however, not a single one of his victims passed the disease on to anyone else.

Now they've placed most, if not all, of their eggs into the mythological "heterosexual AIDS epidemic" basket.

39 posted on 12/17/2001 4:40:05 AM PST by FormerLib
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: zandtar
Sorry FormerLib, but according to most of the extereme leftie groups, everyone else is supposed to be tolerant of them, but not vice versa.

Yes, I know. It works the same way for those who reject the Judeo-Christian moral traditions of this nation. Only they can be called "open-minded!"

40 posted on 12/17/2001 4:42:15 AM PST by FormerLib
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-64 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson