Posted on 12/15/2001 6:23:07 PM PST by LibertyRocks
Braggarts brag.
you make it abundantly clear, day by day and post by post, that you are no friend of Freedom, Liberty, the Constitution, or States Rights. you consistantly, and somewhat succesfully, shirk and shunt any meaningful debate.
you, like so many others here, have nothing of any real substance or value to add to any discussions that take place; instead trolling for any thread containing the word "libertarian" or any thread where people espouse ideals of individual Liberty and Freedom, baiting them and engaging in petty flame wars.
it's funny that you act like your opinions and your words are an absolute truth, when simple fact and reason will prove otherwise.
Your fears are not unwarranted as your time of rule is nearly up.
Zealots are frequently egomaniacal and delusional.
Sooner or later this nation is going to be saying no to any kind of taliban such as yourself. Deny it if you will, but I see it coming just around the corner.
Okay, at least there was a smiley on that. :)
I certianly want to see fewer laws restricting weapon ownership. The people you don't want to have weapons are by definition the same ones you want behind bars. Why let them out and take away my dad's old rifle just doesn't make sense.
You really think this guy's crazy? You really think he's going to do more harm than good to RKBA?
He is.
Why would that trouble them unless they had a vested interest in initiating force? But they will never openly admit that anymore than Clinton would admit to having sex with Monica Lewinski or Jennifer Flowers.
LMAO, still macho flashing I see.
Not until he is arrested. Gawd, you are a moron, but then a lot have pointed that out on this thread.
Do you have the slightest bit of concern for accuracy? You have no idea what you're talking about. No one needs be arrested to challenge the consitutionality of a law like this. Put down your crack pipe man. I suppose you agree with this dunce's other statement:
Stanley contends the law he is charged under violates his civil rights and he will be seeking a jury trial to have the ordinance declared unconstitutional.
Do Colorado juries now declare laws unconstitutional?
You've got your vocabulary confused, "Nack" does NOT mean contempt.
Something you america haters just haven't submitted to.
Did you thnk I'd let that one go unchallenged? I'm fine with America, it's Amerika and you fedophiliac Amerikans that bother me?
What special thing have you ever done to promote liberty? I figure you for a keyboard commando, at best. Have you ever actually had thecourage to go out and meet any other freepers? Or do you just sit in you lonely hole, jealously resenting those who exercise freedoms you would like to take from them? Or are you some little chemistry geek who is trying to get his revenge on all those who made fun of him in school by siding with those who disregard the Constitution, the Founders, and Liberty and Freedom?
Gee thats funny. Another Denver lawyer filed suit based on the same law being unconstitutional and the court rejected it because he did not have standing. He had to ammend the complaint to prove he was somehow injured by the statute. So who doesn't know what they are talking about? Perhaps your preoccupation with crack pipes has clouded your judgement.
That's exactly what the Southern racists said about Martin Luther King Jr., when he openly violated existing laws and got sent to jail so he could get the constitutionality of those challenged in court cases. People such as yourselves are content to sit on your collective asses behind your keyboards, doing nothing to challenge the unconstitutionality of bad laws. You will benefit from the liberty these libertarians suffer to bring you, but you will never thank them for their efforts. |
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.