Not until he is arrested. Gawd, you are a moron, but then a lot have pointed that out on this thread.
Do you have the slightest bit of concern for accuracy? You have no idea what you're talking about. No one needs be arrested to challenge the consitutionality of a law like this. Put down your crack pipe man. I suppose you agree with this dunce's other statement:
Stanley contends the law he is charged under violates his civil rights and he will be seeking a jury trial to have the ordinance declared unconstitutional.
Do Colorado juries now declare laws unconstitutional?
Gee thats funny. Another Denver lawyer filed suit based on the same law being unconstitutional and the court rejected it because he did not have standing. He had to ammend the complaint to prove he was somehow injured by the statute. So who doesn't know what they are talking about? Perhaps your preoccupation with crack pipes has clouded your judgement.