Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

DENVER VS. THE U.S. CONSTITUTION
Stanley for U.S. Senate Campaign ^ | December 15, 2001 - Bill of Rights Day | N/A

Posted on 12/15/2001 6:23:07 PM PST by LibertyRocks

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 261-280281-300301-320 ... 481-500 next last
To: D Joyce
The most charitable thing I can attribute to you is, your a Twit.

You are being WAY to kind ....

281 posted on 12/16/2001 1:33:20 PM PST by clamper1797
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 276 | View Replies]

To: suijuris
National CCW is a doubled edged sword. If all the law states is that any state must honor a CCW issued by another state or the laws of that state which allow CCW just like a drivers license it's not a problem. One problem is Vermont which has no laws restricting CCW. I don't know how another state would handle that. Would a Vermont driver's license be sufficient?

If a national CCW law requires a federal agency to pass judgement on who is allowed CCW or maintain a database, that's a problem.

282 posted on 12/16/2001 1:53:01 PM PST by meatloaf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: LIBERTARIAN JOE
Talk is cheap. The LP is nothing but talk.
283 posted on 12/16/2001 1:53:17 PM PST by Roscoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 277 | View Replies]

To: MississippiMan
Your story expresses a natural consequence of our socialist state. In the past no one would question your right to allow whomever into your store. Now that you work for the public good however patrons expect to be able to do whatever they please on your supposed private property.

But, in this case in order to challenge the law you must be charged. So this was a necessary act. Most gun haters will not be persuaded by logic anyway.
284 posted on 12/16/2001 1:59:18 PM PST by verboten
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: LibertyRocks
I advocate absolute adherence to the 2nd Amendment by any of our many governments from local to national. My rights are given by God and not by a piece of paper, but those spelled out and affirmed by our Bill of Rights are absolute.

I even appreciate this Libertarian standing up for the 2nd Amendment. I'm not a Libertarian, and I have different interpretations and understandings for other areas such as the War on Terrorism, but on this issue, this man is right.

285 posted on 12/16/2001 2:07:26 PM PST by xzins
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Roscoe
Talk is cheap. The LP is nothing but talk.

You mean Rick Stanley was arrested today for cheap talking? Dang they got a law for everything these days.

286 posted on 12/16/2001 2:10:04 PM PST by takenoprisoner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 283 | View Replies]

To: takenoprisoner
Getting arrested is an accomplishment? Pathetic.
287 posted on 12/16/2001 2:14:14 PM PST by Roscoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 286 | View Replies]

To: BenR2
Spoken like a true (the state is my god) statist thug.

No skin off my boot if he ends up being arrested.

288 posted on 12/16/2001 2:18:31 PM PST by VA Advogado
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 265 | View Replies]

To: Roscoe
Getting arrested is an accomplishment? Pathetic.

I believe it has been proven reliable tool for social change in the past. Care to challenge?

289 posted on 12/16/2001 2:19:42 PM PST by takenoprisoner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 287 | View Replies]

To: takenoprisoner
I believe it has been proven reliable tool

Not in the hands on the LP. Can you come up with even one example?

290 posted on 12/16/2001 2:22:15 PM PST by Roscoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 289 | View Replies]

To: LibertyRocks
I remember one Denver law that is still in the books to this day. Something about not shooting at prairie dogs from the back window of a cable car with a 30-30. Rabbits - OK. Bus window - OK. 30.06 - OK. But apparently certain isolated circumstances are targeted for swift clampdown.
291 posted on 12/16/2001 2:23:14 PM PST by freepy smurf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EricOKC
Here is where i will have to disagree with you. The AAA was one of the strongest lobbying groups attempting to RETAIN the 55MPH limit.

Do you just lie and make stuff up? Read this . This is the AAA spokesman talking about how happy they were that the power to set speed limits was going from the federal government back to the states.

"The swift actions of these legislators were bolstered by the support of motorist advocates. "We believe that the states will do as good a job, or even a better job, at setting and enforcing the limits," says Bill Jackman, a spokesman for the American Automobile Association. "In many states the federal limits were really disdained. . . . All of the state departments of transportation are responsible institutions with respectable people working in them. We trust them to do their jobs well." With 39 million members nationwide, AAA represents the interests of almost a quarter of all licensed drivers. "

292 posted on 12/16/2001 2:23:26 PM PST by VA Advogado
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 266 | View Replies]

To: EricOKC
Like it or not, D Joyce is correct.

After you just made that stuff up about AAA opposing the repeal of the federal 55 mph, you have no credibility to speak on anything.

293 posted on 12/16/2001 2:24:53 PM PST by VA Advogado
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 267 | View Replies]

To: VA Advogado
Aren't Libertarians entitled to invent facts?
294 posted on 12/16/2001 2:26:29 PM PST by Roscoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 292 | View Replies]

To: Maelstrom
The law was changed because practically NOBODY obeyed the 55mph speed limit law.

There are lots of laws that are ingnored and not enforced. But for one to be repealed requires active lobbying.

295 posted on 12/16/2001 2:28:02 PM PST by VA Advogado
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 278 | View Replies]

To: Roscoe
Talk is cheap. --- The roscoes of this world spout nothing but cheap talk.
296 posted on 12/16/2001 2:28:14 PM PST by tpaine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 283 | View Replies]

To: tpaine
Talk is cheap.

You said it.

297 posted on 12/16/2001 2:29:44 PM PST by Roscoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 296 | View Replies]

To: Maelstrom
Re: Maritime Contract Court IT's obvious you have no idea what D. Joyce was talking about.

Is this like one of them there common law courts/trials where you good militia folks try and convict your local officals and then put liens on their property?

298 posted on 12/16/2001 2:30:28 PM PST by VA Advogado
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 280 | View Replies]

To: VA Advogado
Talk is cheap. --- The 'va advogados' of this world spout nothing but cheap talk.

BTW, - what is a 'va advogodo'?

299 posted on 12/16/2001 2:32:23 PM PST by tpaine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 295 | View Replies]

To: Roscoe
Aren't Libertarians entitled to invent facts?

For people who are always imploring others to read these documents, they have to be the most illiterate spongeheads I've ever met. If they didnt have such soft skulls surely they would hear echos as they typed.

300 posted on 12/16/2001 2:33:38 PM PST by VA Advogado
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 294 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 261-280281-300301-320 ... 481-500 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson