Browne deserves mud for his recent "it's America's fault" articles. And you gladly voted for Browne in Florida. You came very close to giving us a Gore Presidency.
As for your Bush smear, everybody knows that Dan Burton's committee is a sieve of information to the liberal press. Once Henry Waxman or Barney Frank got their hands on the Clinton information, it would have been faxed to the New York Times and Washington Post where it would be "laundered" to "clean up" Clinton. I am glad that Bush/Ashcroft are keeping the information out of Waxman's/Frank's hands. Sure Bush/Ashcroft may lose a minor battle, but IMHO, they are looking to win the war.
Not at all, despite your claims. Let me explain it to you once again. Assuming a non-tainted, non-rigged voting pool, a candidate only gets to count the votes that are FOR that candidate. Votes that are NOT for that candidate are NOT subtracted from that candidate's total.
Your supposition is that my vote belonged to Bush and that I gave it to algore, neither of which is true.
Sometimes it is better to have an aknowledged opponent infront of you in the open than it is to have a hidden on behind you.
As for your Bush smear, everybody knows that Dan Burton's committee is a sieve of information to the liberal press
Case in point.Sometimes it is better to have an aknowledged opponent in front of you in the open than it is to have a hidden on behind you.
Do you really believe that Bush is seeking justice by sandbagging clinton into slumber so that Bush can blindside him later? I'd cheer it if he does, but I don't believe that's what he's doing.
We hollered when clinton abused Executive Privelge. Why accept it now?
So, the fact that 50 percent of the votes cast werent for Bush is someone the fault of a small segment of those voters? I speak only for myself, but I'll say this - Whichever party offers a candidate whose ideals are in accord with mine, that party's candidate gets my vote. This two-party thought system is a big part of what's wrong with our government. It's A or B, black or white, Republican or Democrat, you're either with us or against us In real life, things are just a little more complicated than that
Bush has given us a Gore presidency just fine all on his own.
I couldn't tell the difference between the two during their debates. Even when the moderator asked them what differentiated the two they just sort of looked at each other and shrugged their shoulders.
I don't see Bush rolling back any of the Clinton/Gore big government programs. No big suprise. He wasn't elected to reduce government. Over the last year I've watched Bush sign huge spending increases into law to continue funding all those wonderful alphabet agencies that send hundreds of billions of dollars down the sewer.