Bush has given us a Gore presidency just fine all on his own.
I couldn't tell the difference between the two during their debates. Even when the moderator asked them what differentiated the two they just sort of looked at each other and shrugged their shoulders.
I don't see Bush rolling back any of the Clinton/Gore big government programs. No big suprise. He wasn't elected to reduce government. Over the last year I've watched Bush sign huge spending increases into law to continue funding all those wonderful alphabet agencies that send hundreds of billions of dollars down the sewer.
Unlike his supporters, I believed Bush to be a man of his word and that he would do what he said he would do. I believed that he would expand government as he pledged to do. So far, it seems, I've not been incorrect.