Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The essence of liberty: What is it that really makes one a libertarian?
LP News ^ | March 1995 | David F. Nolan

Posted on 12/15/2001 11:36:38 AM PST by jackbob

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160 ... 201-214 next last
To: ThomasJefferson
I rest my case.

Motion to Separate and Dismiss

Re: ThomasJefferson, Honest Rational Freepers, et al.

Vs.

Roscoe, et al.

Comes now jackbob on a third party motion to dismiss charges against Roscoe for lack of evidence.

The quote of Roscoe: "Oops, too late." can be shown to have been a fair and decent quote, with no intent to lower FR standards or do harm to any potential discussion.

A closer examination of the evidence will show that he posted that reply at 12:48pm (and was most likely meant to be addressed to jackbob). As six minutes earlier there was a posted invitation to him, that will put his reply in proper context.

In reply #983 to the article "Will Libertarians bolt The Stupid Party?" the following invitation was put forth to Roscoe by one jackbob;

I just posted an article on what it is to be a libertarian. I know you'll want to hurry over to crap on it. If you move fast enough, maybe you can be the first reply.

It is clear in this instance (and only this one), that jackbob, and not Roscoe has rightfully earned the full condemnation all good faithed Freepers. For no good Freeper would have ever made such an invitation.

121 posted on 12/15/2001 5:35:17 PM PST by jackbob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies]

To: jackbob
LOL
122 posted on 12/15/2001 5:36:38 PM PST by Roscoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 121 | View Replies]

To: Roscoe
I didn't see where HB said we owe UBL an apology. Course depending upon the perceptions of the masses, and from his stated views, such could be erroneously inferred as has been postulated here.

Nonetheless, I did find another interesting article there. Is this American Hypocrisy?

123 posted on 12/15/2001 5:44:04 PM PST by takenoprisoner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 113 | View Replies]

To: secretagent
Taxation is low, simple-- and contains a surprise. The Federal government is supported by a head tax paid by the States , and is mostly for military and foreign affairs. This state derives most of it's revenue from real estate taxes. It is a uniform rate set annually, with no property exempted, not even churches, hospitals, or schools-- or roads; the best roads are toll roads. The surprise lies in this: _The_owner_appraises_his_own_ property._ There is a sting in the tail: _Anyone_ can buy property _against_the_owner's_wishes_ at the appraisal the owner placed on it. The owner can hang on only by raising his appraisal _at_once_ to a figure so high that no buyer wants it-- and pay _three_years_back_taxes_ at his _new_ appraisal.

TNOTB

124 posted on 12/15/2001 5:51:43 PM PST by Roscoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 120 | View Replies]

To: Maurice Tift
Then join the LP.
125 posted on 12/15/2001 6:05:52 PM PST by jackbob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 96 | View Replies]

To: Economist_MA
The pure fact that a central bank could theoretically wreck havoc with the money supply is no argument whatsoever against fractional reserve banking

You nailed it!

126 posted on 12/15/2001 6:08:14 PM PST by takenoprisoner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 119 | View Replies]

To: Roscoe
Thanks!
127 posted on 12/15/2001 6:08:18 PM PST by secretagent
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 124 | View Replies]

To: Dane
This looks like a move to deflect critism from Bush's trashing of the Presidential Records Act. Under the act, Reagan papers became public property in Jan 2001. Bush is trying to hide the papers from public view. Why? Think like a wolf.
128 posted on 12/15/2001 6:11:11 PM PST by think_like_a_wolf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: jackbob
Motion granted :-) (just this once)
129 posted on 12/15/2001 6:13:26 PM PST by Protagoras
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 121 | View Replies]

To: Dane;Eagle Eye
You came very close to giving us a Gore Presidency. - Dane

Bush has given us a Gore presidency just fine all on his own.

I couldn't tell the difference between the two during their debates. Even when the moderator asked them what differentiated the two they just sort of looked at each other and shrugged their shoulders.

I don't see Bush rolling back any of the Clinton/Gore big government programs. No big suprise. He wasn't elected to reduce government. Over the last year I've watched Bush sign huge spending increases into law to continue funding all those wonderful alphabet agencies that send hundreds of billions of dollars down the sewer.

130 posted on 12/15/2001 6:50:50 PM PST by Alan Chapman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: jackbob
In an ideal world, there would be no taxation. All services would be paid for on an as-used basis. For something to be paid for as-used, it first has to be created.

Without taxes, public highways would not exist (markets fail to provide public goods). And only a robber baron would be able to build private roads of any significance, in which case the interests of people who need a road would still not be served.

Libertarian non-taxation. Nice romantic idea --- like Knighthood. Unfortunately, we are well past the Middle Ages.

131 posted on 12/15/2001 7:03:28 PM PST by TopQuark
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TopQuark
Piracy, n. Commerce without its folly-swaddles, just as God made it.
-- Ambrose Bierce
132 posted on 12/15/2001 7:06:18 PM PST by Roscoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 131 | View Replies]

To: Roscoe
Piracy, n. Commerce without its folly-swaddles, just as God made it.
-- Ambrose Bierce
Which in this context means what?
133 posted on 12/15/2001 7:15:04 PM PST by TopQuark
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 132 | View Replies]

To: TopQuark
Believing in unrestricted commerce seems to one of the things that makes one a libertarian.
134 posted on 12/15/2001 7:18:23 PM PST by Roscoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 133 | View Replies]

To: Roscoe
Thanks, Roscoe. Why do you think he did not mention "free trade?"
135 posted on 12/15/2001 7:26:32 PM PST by TopQuark
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 134 | View Replies]

To: TopQuark
He being Bierce? I'm not sure that the term "free trade" was in common usage when he wrote.
136 posted on 12/15/2001 7:32:21 PM PST by Roscoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 135 | View Replies]

To: carenot
But if Gore were President what would everyone be saying now?

Let me throw an additional proviso on to the question. If Gore were President, having done the exact same things that President Bush has done, what would everyone be saying now?

137 posted on 12/15/2001 7:39:31 PM PST by jackbob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 103 | View Replies]

To: Roscoe
No, no --- I was not clear, sorry. I meant, why does David Nolan in the posted article not mention free trade?
138 posted on 12/15/2001 7:40:04 PM PST by TopQuark
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 136 | View Replies]

To: ThomasJefferson, TightSqueeze
Some libertarians believe that a baby yet unborn is not a person or human being.

Actually its a little more complicated than that. The question is not whether it is a person or not. The question is whether it is an individual person or individual humanbeing. It might also be noted that it does not just end there. This is just the starting point for various libertarian theories on the topic (i.e. some Randian Libertarians assert a necessity to assert ones claim to life, some Christian libertarians reserve rights till after the first breath of life with entry of the spirit into its body, etc, etc, etc.).

My position is that if there is any chance whatsoever that it even might be a life...

My position is that if there is an chance it might suffer pain, then error on the side of not introducing pain.

139 posted on 12/15/2001 7:42:41 PM PST by jackbob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 99 | View Replies]

To: Roscoe
In honor of your post, Roscoe:
----------------------
AMBROSE BIERCE (1842-1914?)
THE NEW DECALOGUE

1     Have but one God: thy knees were sore
2     If bent in prayer to three or four.

3     Adore no images save those
4     The coinage of thy country shows.

5     Take not the Name in vain. Direct
6     Thy swearing unto some effect.

7     Thy hand from Sunday work be held--
8     Work not at all unless compelled.

9     Honor thy parents, and perchance
10   Their wills thy fortunes may advance.

11   Kill not--death liberates thy foe
12   From persecution's constant woe.

13   Kiss not thy neighbor's wife. Of course
14   There's no objection to divorce.

15   To steal were folly, for 'tis plain
16   In cheating there is greater pain.

17   Bear not false witness. Shake your head
18   And say that you have "heard it said."

19   Who stays to covet ne'er will catch
20   An opportunity to snatch.

140 posted on 12/15/2001 7:43:59 PM PST by TopQuark
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 132 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160 ... 201-214 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson