The left understands the principle of incrementalism, but I often wonder whether those on the right grasp it at all.
And the Republicans crushed them. (Gingrich gets plenty of credit here, because found every open wound, and every "scandal" from the abuse of power, that the Democrats had left open -- and he rubbed salt hard into each one of those open wounds. But even without Gingrich, the Republicans would have won that election).
I'm sorry if some get offended, but you have to keep the passive mushy massive middle of a huge nation comfortable. They are not comfortable with anything that smacks of extremism. This is where the left has been effective -- slowly, through schools and media and entertainment, changed the minds of the population just enough to make many of their truly wacky ideas mainstream -- ideas that would have been extremism if they had attempted to impose them through government fiat.
Since 1994, the Democrats have not erred in that way again and they have slowly eaten away at the Republican gains, because they DO represent the strongest plurality (not majority, plurality) in this generation. The Republicans have not really "won" an election outright since 1994. They have, through a well-run campaign, through a relatively weak Rat candidate and through the "thousand small cuts" of a sordid scandal, by the barest of margins managed to "guerilla" in a President. One who is now very popular. Hopefully, fortune is with us again, but I'd be more comfortable seeing the Rats make a few mistakes, just to be sure.
They only lost when Newt Gingrich caved to Clinton in the so-called "government shutdown." Until that point, every leftist law prof in the country was literally shaking and crying over the return of the Republic.