RED AND BLUE RECONSIDERED (Johnny Walker a "Right Wing Zealot??")

"The Daily Dish" ^ | 11 December 01 | Andrew Sullivan

[Dr. Frank fan]

Hilarious!

What a devastating, meticulously reasoned comeback. Kudos to you, and kudos again! Clearly I am no match for your debating skills. [ /sarcasm ]

I think what this really indicates is that I overestimated you in crafting my response, which is why the above sarcasm has become the more appropriate way of dealing with you. Sorry I wasted my time. (By this I mean that I feel sorrow for having wasted my time. It is not an apology to you, or anything.)

[Lazamataz]

Oh man...you are a barrel of monkeys...Fun Fun Fun

The Washington Times credible???

You offer nothing but repetition. This is called "buffoonery". Put up some evidence that the Washington Times lacks credibility or forever be known as a durak.

[smith288]

No...Christmas Story.

[Lazamataz]

I like the wizard of oz...I like the scarecrow....

I would have guessed The Professional or C.H.U.D., but you went and told us. :o)

[dead]

I hold a pebble in my hand. When you can snatch the pebble, you will be a true ninja warrior. Ipso facto the pebble snatching is in itself the ninja tool to which you aspire. Are you getting a clue as to my meaning yet?

Eldar Pompous
Ireeka, KS

[Dr. Octagon]

Sensai?

[ahmedtousay1]

If you want evidence--it is there on each and every page of every issue in all its dank ardor.

Nice try with using Russian albeit in an inappropriate manner. It's amazing what one can do with an Internet connection these days.

Eldar Pompov
Topeka, KS

[Lazamataz]

If you want evidence--it is there on each and every page of every issue in all its dank ardor.

So, by failing to come up with any actual citations, you admit you have no direct evidence that the Washington Times is anything but a credible -- in fact, a premier -- newspaper.

Like any liberal, I'm sure you FEEEEEEEEeeeeelll that it is not credible, and that is enough for you. You are an annoying little liberal who I expect will be shown the door soon.

Nice try with using Russian albeit in an inappropriate manner.

What inappropriate? I called you a durak, and that means fool, and you are certainly that.

[ahmedtousay1]

You are going to show me the door for being smarter than you? That is typical of the behavior here. Not once have I resorted to profanity, personal attacks, etc.

If the Washington Times had credibility it would be indexed and offered full-text in any of the many subscription databases now available.

I must move along now to other posts where the dialog is a little more enlightened and less driven by name calling. Good day.

Eldar Pompov
Topeka, KS

[ahmedtousay1]

You are going to show me the door for being smarter than you? That is typical of the behavior here. Not once have I resorted to profanity, personal attacks, etc.

If the Washington Times had credibility it would be indexed and offered full-text in any of the many subscription databases now available.

I must move along now to other posts where the dialog is a little more enlightened and less driven by name calling. Good day.

Eldar Pompov
Topeka, KS

[Lazamataz]

You are going to show me the door for being smarter than you?

I cannot show you the door. That is up to the moderators. However, this is a CONSERVATIVE political forum, and if you are here, it is by Jim Robinson's tolerance only. If he becomes annoyed by you, buh bye.

That is typical of the behavior here. Not once have I resorted to profanity, personal attacks, etc.

Yep. Just being a liberal is enough 'round these parts. Of course, if you are a liberal with a cogent argument, you can survive. One 'ferret' did for many years, for example. Good guy.

If the Washington Times had credibility it would be indexed and offered full-text in any of the many subscription databases now available.

THIS is your criteria?!?! Oh my everloving bell-ringing electric teflon Jesus.

• Not the accuracy of the articles -- you cannot come up with any inaccuracies.
• Not the breaking nature of their news -- Brent Bozell documents numerous times that the Washington Times led the pack.
• Not the quality of the reporters -- the internationally recognized Bill Gertz, John McCaslin (who was an award-winning UPI reporter before coming aboard the Times), award-winning investigative journalists Jerry Seper and Donald Lambro (who have also written several books fairly recently)

• But instead you point to some database you don't even give me a reference as to the location of?!?!

You are pathetic. Your intelligence is nonexistent. Your research is nonexistent. You have no citations. Your arguments are entirely without merit.

I must move along now to other posts where the dialog is a little more enlightened and less driven by name calling. Good day.

ENLIGHTENED!!!! ENLIGHTENED!!!!! YOU!?!? BBWWWWWWWWAAAA AHAHHAHAHHAHAHHAHHAHH AHAHHAHAHAHHHAHA HAHAHAHHHHAH !!!!!!!

[ahmedtousay1]

To quote the esteemed Bob Dole, who I had the pleasure of voting for for Senator, "down boy". This is a Conservative forum--LOL--Yes, and one without much bite either.

Eldar Pompov
Topeka, KS

[Lazamataz]

To quote the esteemed Bob Dole, who I had the pleasure of voting for for Senator, "down boy". This is a Conservative forum--LOL--Yes, and one without much bite either.

You have no citations. You do no research. You offer nothing but platitudes and baseless comments.

And you accuse US of being without 'bite'?!

You're taking a play right out of the Clinton Playbook: Accuse your opponent of exactly what you are hip-deep in doing.

[Ditto]

Now to my question: At no time do I ever remember Tim McVeigh's or Terry Nichols' rantings include Christianity, do you? I only remember them being anti-government and anti-Waco and Ruby Ridge.

Any opportunity to slam Christianity, deserved or not. Although I believe McVeigh, after refusing to see a priest all through his confinement finally did have the last rights of the Church performed shortly before his execution. He likely did it at only to mollify his family, not out of any belief. Anyone who could call the children he killed in that building ‘collateral damage’ is in no way a Christian or a God fearing believer of any faith.

The people who make these relativist arguments are the same people who will say that Hitler was a Christian when he was not. While he was ‘born a Catholic’ there is no evidence that he ever practiced the faith as an adult. He was a professed atheist who dabbled in some pagan mysticism. He disdained all mainstream religions and considered Christianity a religion of “losers’ as Ted Turner would say. He was also a vegetarian and an early version of an animal rights activist. Like many sadists, he hated people, but had an unusual attachment to animals. Hitler’s views on religion would have blended right in with the narcissistic culture of places like Marin County that produced this littlest Talaban.

[SEA]

Here's an interesting take on the mental processes this traitor used to get from the US to the Taliban:

American Brainwashing

"There is a sad irony to the claim of John Walker's mother that he 'must have been brainwashed.' Before departing for the madrassas of Pakistan, Mr. Walker doubtlessly passed through an American education establishment that routinely denigrates the Founding Fathers as racists, reduces literature to grievance manifestoes and belittles traditional values in the name of 'diversity.' Why, then, must we question why a disillusioned young man, taught to despise his own culture, journeyed to Afghanistan to find an identity? Mr. Walker was indeed brainwashed, but not by the Taliban. It happened here in America."

- Eric Sundell, Baltimore Sun, 12/11/01