I cannot show you the door. That is up to the moderators. However, this is a CONSERVATIVE political forum, and if you are here, it is by Jim Robinson's tolerance only. If he becomes annoyed by you, buh bye.
That is typical of the behavior here. Not once have I resorted to profanity, personal attacks, etc.
Yep. Just being a liberal is enough 'round these parts. Of course, if you are a liberal with a cogent argument, you can survive. One 'ferret' did for many years, for example. Good guy.
If the Washington Times had credibility it would be indexed and offered full-text in any of the many subscription databases now available.
THIS is your criteria?!?! Oh my everloving bell-ringing electric teflon Jesus.
- Not the accuracy of the articles -- you cannot come up with any inaccuracies.
- Not the breaking nature of their news -- Brent Bozell documents numerous times that the Washington Times led the pack.
- Not the quality of the reporters -- the internationally recognized Bill Gertz, John McCaslin (who was an award-winning UPI reporter before coming aboard the Times), award-winning investigative journalists Jerry Seper and Donald Lambro (who have also written several books fairly recently)
- But instead you point to some database you don't even give me a reference as to the location of?!?!
You are pathetic. Your intelligence is nonexistent. Your research is nonexistent. You have no citations. Your arguments are entirely without merit.
I must move along now to other posts where the dialog is a little more enlightened and less driven by name calling. Good day.
ENLIGHTENED!!!! ENLIGHTENED!!!!! YOU!?!? BBWWWWWWWWAAAA AHAHHAHAHHAHAHHAHHAHH AHAHHAHAHAHHHAHA HAHAHAHHHHAH !!!!!!!