[Lazamataz]

If you want evidence--it is there on each and every page of every issue in all its dank ardor.

So, by failing to come up with any actual citations, you admit you have no direct evidence that the Washington Times is anything but a credible -- in fact, a premier -- newspaper.

Like any liberal, I'm sure you FEEEEEEEEeeeeelll that it is not credible, and that is enough for you. You are an annoying little liberal who I expect will be shown the door soon.

Nice try with using Russian albeit in an inappropriate manner.

What inappropriate? I called you a durak, and that means fool, and you are certainly that.

[ahmedtousay1]

You are going to show me the door for being smarter than you? That is typical of the behavior here. Not once have I resorted to profanity, personal attacks, etc.

If the Washington Times had credibility it would be indexed and offered full-text in any of the many subscription databases now available.

I must move along now to other posts where the dialog is a little more enlightened and less driven by name calling. Good day.

Eldar Pompov
Topeka, KS

[ahmedtousay1]

You are going to show me the door for being smarter than you? That is typical of the behavior here. Not once have I resorted to profanity, personal attacks, etc.

If the Washington Times had credibility it would be indexed and offered full-text in any of the many subscription databases now available.

I must move along now to other posts where the dialog is a little more enlightened and less driven by name calling. Good day.

Eldar Pompov
Topeka, KS