[VRWC_minion]

all of the legal experts disagree with you

Never say ALL when speaking about the law. I am not using MY OPINION on this. I am using the plain reading of the text.

[Howlin]

I am not using MY OPINION on this. I am using the plain reading of the text.

No, you're using YOUR interpretation of the plain reading of the text.

Other LEGAL EXPERTS who have read the "plain text" disagree with you. To a person. So far, you'll the only person I've seen saying she has a case.

[Registered]

Never say ALL when speaking about the law. I am not using MY OPINION on this. I am using the plain reading of the text.

I can understand your interpretation of the law. However, an additional piece of information that works against this interpretation is the GAO Plum Book. Published by the government and reviewed by the US Civil Rights Commission and the Senate Cmte on Governmental Oversight, clearly listed the position as expiring on November 29th, 2001. So, how will Berry explain the fact that she reviewed and accepted the inevitable end to Wilson's time on the board as is listed in the Plum book?? Hmmm? BTW, how do YOU interpret the listing in the GAO Plum Book?

It was clearly printed in the GAO Plum book that Wilson's seat was expiring on November 29,2001. DO THESE FREAKS NEED READING LESSONS?!?!?! WHAT IS GOING ON HERE. GET THE MARSHALS IN THERE TO REMOVE WILSON FROM THE SEAT NOW!!! $123 thousand a year, Wilson should be fined that amount for every day her fat butt sits on that panel!! FREEPERS UNITE!!