Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Congressman Billybob
Berry has facts on her side

Sec. 1975. Establishment of Commission


5 posted on 12/08/2001 9:36:02 AM PST by VRWC_minion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: VRWC_minion
Berry and Wilson are trying to argue that that the terms are no longer staggered. However, once they become staggared (as they were made so prior to 1994 and thereafter validated with those changes) they are forever staggared. Anyone appointed in mid term serves only so long as the original appointee. They have no leg to stand on.
6 posted on 12/08/2001 9:40:51 AM PST by VA Advogado
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: VRWC_minion
However, Wilson was NOT appointed to a 6 year term, she was appointed to fill the unexpired appointment of someone else. Her temporary appointment is expired. Period, end of sentence, end of appointment.
The term of the person's place she took expired November 29, 2001.
8 posted on 12/08/2001 9:48:52 AM PST by ladyinred
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: VRWC_minion
Berry has facts on her side

She does not. Victoria Wilson was appointed to FULFILL a term of ANOTHER commissioner. She doesn't have a prayer of winning this.

17 posted on 12/08/2001 10:02:57 AM PST by Howlin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: VRWC_minion
She has no facts on her side, only a very weak interpretation of law. And, her silence over the years on the length of the appointment in question leads me to conclude that she tacitly agreed with the Clinton Administration's interpretation. She picked poor ground on which to empty her magazine.
25 posted on 12/08/2001 10:14:17 AM PST by PeoplesRepublicOfWashington
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: VRWC_minion
"Not more than 4 of the members shall at any one time be of the same political party."

Ooooooh ... That'a why she (Berry) claims she is an independent!
49 posted on 12/08/2001 10:55:46 AM PST by gjenkins
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: VRWC_minion
The President may appoint a member to fill a vacancy. For a vacancy to be termed other than a fill in for a length of the absent member's term is really stretching it, especially given that the President that appointed her to fill a vacancy also noted the date that was to be the end of her term.

They are way off base, both should be terminated, one because the term she was filling in for has expired, and the other for malfeasance of office.

79 posted on 12/08/2001 11:53:58 AM PST by MissAmericanPie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson