To: ladyinred
However, Wilson was NOT appointed to a 6 year term, she was appointed to fill the unexpired appointment of someone else. The president had no authority to appoint her to anything less than a 6 year term.
To: VRWC_minion
The president had no authority to appoint her to anything less than a 6 year term.Apparently Clinton did just that. If that was beyond his authority, then the original appointment was made illegally, and that would leave us back where we started - with the position vacant, and available to be filled by an appointee of GW's choosing.
To: VRWC_minion
The president had no authority to appoint her to anything less than a 6 year term.So Clinton broke the law when he made the appointment?
43 posted on
12/08/2001 10:49:26 AM PST by
billva
To: VRWC_minion
If the president had no authority to appoint Wilson to less than a six-year term, and the president appointed Wilson to less than a 6-year term, then there was no appointment at all since the president had no authority to make an appointment of less than six years. If the president could only appoint Wilson to a six-year term, then he didn't appoint her at all because his letter of appointment designated an expiration of the appointment in less than six years.
44 posted on
12/08/2001 10:49:55 AM PST by
Whilom
To: VRWC_minion
in fact clinton put a date final on his appointment of wilson , that date is nov 21 or 25 2001. so neither berry nor wilson have a leg to stand on.
98 posted on
12/08/2001 1:44:09 PM PST by
liliana
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson