Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: VRWC_minion
If the president had no authority to appoint Wilson to less than a six-year term, and the president appointed Wilson to less than a 6-year term, then there was no appointment at all since the president had no authority to make an appointment of less than six years. If the president could only appoint Wilson to a six-year term, then he didn't appoint her at all because his letter of appointment designated an expiration of the appointment in less than six years.
44 posted on 12/08/2001 10:49:55 AM PST by Whilom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]


To: Whilom
That's a persuasive argument, and I think most courts would buy it. Unfortunately, I fear a Clintonista district court judge would not.
46 posted on 12/08/2001 10:53:33 AM PST by aristeides
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies ]

To: Whilom
If the president had no authority to appoint Wilson to less than a six-year term, and the president appointed Wilson to less than a 6-year term, then there was no appointment at all since the president had no authority to make an appointment of less than six years. If the president could only appoint Wilson to a six-year term, then he didn't appoint her at all because his letter of appointment designated an expiration of the appointment in less than six years.

VRWC_minion this definately blows your "Leg to stand on theory" all the Hades!

60 posted on 12/08/2001 11:10:43 AM PST by sirchtruth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson