Posted on 12/06/2001 2:50:43 PM PST by KQQL
Tribunals' critics will pay in next election
By ZELL MILLER
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The howls of protest over the administration's efforts to treat terrorists like the war criminals they are is mind-boggling. The critics are crying foul at the mere mention of bringing suspected terrorists to justice in military tribunals. This obsession with protecting the rights of terrorists is naive and wrongheaded. And if you don't want to take my word for it, just wait -- voters will say it loud and clear in next year's elections.
The critics forget a key fact: We are at war. Thousands of innocent citizens were killed on U.S. soil, and the terrorists are plotting new attacks. This is the time to unite in trying to defeat our enemy with every tool at our disposal. It's no time to wring our hands like nervous Nellies, worrying whether a suspected terrorist might sue because he wasn't read his rights.
President Bush is proposing military tribunals only for non-citizens, and he is absolutely right to do so. The Supreme Court has twice upheld military tribunals as constitutional. Military tribunals are the traditional venue for prosecuting war criminals and they have been used throughout this nation's history by several presidents.
Military tribunals will prevent us from having to reveal and compromise our nation's sensitive intelligence information in court, as happened during the eight months of court proceedings against the men suspected in the 1993 terrorist bombing at the World Trade Center.
Military tribunals will also prevent countless communities, courthouses and jurors in this country from becoming targets for terrorists. And they will prevent key witnesses from keeping silent out of a very legitimate fear of revenge from terrorist groups.
This is the same system of justice we use forour military. If our own American soldiers aren't entitled to the benefits of jury trials in civilian courts, why in the world would we extend that benefit to foreigners who are trying to kill Americans?
Even military tribunals are too good for these terrorists. These killers will receive legal counsel and fair trials from us. That's much more than the terrorists have ever offered to their victims.
The critics say Attorney General John Ashcroft is shredding the Constitution. They've wrongly turned Ashcroft into the enemy while our true enemy is still at large.
It's crazy. Ashcroft is right to use military tribunals for terrorists. He is right to detain those suspected of helping the terrorists. He is right to monitor the prison phone calls between suspected al-Qaida agents and their lawyers.
What would the critics have us do? Sit back and wait as these imprisoned terrorists plot their next attack on America right under our nose from an American jail cell? Get off Ashcroft's back and let him do his job.
Within days of the Sept. 11 attack on this country, a united Congress gave President Bush a green light to go after the terrorists. It's time to honor our word and get our priorities straight. It's time to let our commander in chief win this war with every weapon he can muster.
You win a war by being as tough and merciless as your enemy. You lose a war by catering to your enemy, by sending the message that you care more about the enemy's rights than your own country's safety. It's a message the voters are sure to receive.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
However, Walker did serve in a foreign military, whether or not we recognized the government. Someone could serve as a mercenary for a rebel army and face a similar sanction, even though the military in which they were serving was not part of a recognized government.
All this little freeper wants is for Zell Miller to become a Republican...
Thank you,
Doggie
Me too Santa. Same wish.
Zell, why don't you tell your buddies Leaky Leahy, Teddy Kennedy and Tom Dasshole?
I don't recall him ever asking, besides anyone who opposed a Declaration of War, prior to America engaging in war would have been pasted with "making common cause with the WTC attackers" in the next elections.
By not requesting a Declaration of War and then wanting to hold any high level taliban or al queda for trial by military tribunal Shrub guts the Constitution and hundreds of years of established international law.
That's the information that comes out at the tribunal. How officials received that information is WHY the suspect must appear at a secret trial/tribunal. Otherwise, the lid would be blown off our intelligence gathering agencies and American citizens put in danger. And not just citizens in military and spy agencies. Every government employee working in whatever jurisdiction picked for such a "trial" would become the target of terrorists. Where do YOU live, maybe YOUR county courthouse will volunteer first???
Don't worry, Ambrose. If you are a U.S. citizen this will never affect you. You may hire Johnny Cochran, if you wish, to represent you in any court of law.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.