1 posted on
12/05/2001 10:56:35 AM PST by
andrew
To: andrew
Liberal toilet paper blowin' in the Conservative whirlwind.
2 posted on
12/05/2001 10:59:58 AM PST by
TADSLOS
To: andrew
When Salon made most of their site subscription-only a couple months ago, they lost the most important thing they still had left: their buzz. Whether you loved or hated Salon, in the past anything they published that was interesting or provocative was linked around, posted here on FR and a thousand other places, and got talked about ... which, of course, led to lots of hits on Salon's site. But now nobody mentions them at all. Even the few truly newsworthy items they break get ignored, because 99% of the potential audience out there can't access the stories at all, and the 1% that can know it's not worth wasting their time telling anyone else about the stories because they can't link to them.
I'd guess it's been over a month since I actually visited a Salon page, and that's not because I'm intentionally boycotting them; they've simply fallen off the radar screen.
3 posted on
12/05/2001 11:13:49 AM PST by
Timesink
To: andrew
hey andrew. thanks for posting the yahoo cite. I went to the message board and posted a note using my Yahoo handle that I registered for when I got the YahooClubFreeRepublic membership (I;m spald_fr).
4 posted on
12/05/2001 11:16:48 AM PST by
spald
To: andrew
Oh, that link to the Yahoo message board is
Right here. I see a number of FReepers already posting there...
5 posted on
12/05/2001 11:18:18 AM PST by
spald
To: andrew
Regardless of political or ideological orientation, only TWO on-line publications have developed a sucessfull paid subscription model..the Wall Street Journal, and oddly enough, Consumer Reports...each has over 650,000 paid subscribers...( the article says 60,000 for the WSJ..it must be a typo)..the major media are pouring hundreds of millions into the black holes of their websites....no way out, but they feel they have to maintain their identity and presense on the web.....but the advertising model doesn't work....
6 posted on
12/05/2001 11:25:47 AM PST by
ken5050
To: andrew
The question is, can Talbot and his minions possibly be investigated by the SEC for fraud? Piss-poor management is one thing, but I'd like to see what his personal balance sheet is like.
8 posted on
12/05/2001 11:37:53 AM PST by
45Auto
To: andrew
For a MUST read in Sloan check out this thread:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/fr/583976/posts
When they sink to a more than worthless financial level (ie negative)I suggest we collect some funds here and buy 'em. That would be sweeeeeeeeeet justice.
9 posted on
12/05/2001 11:56:56 AM PST by
Drango
To: andrew
Good grief - 73 million in the tank and no visible assets? Well, lemmesee...that works out to about $5000 a subscriber. To break even. That thumping at the door isn't shareholders trying to get in, it's the wolf.
To: andrew
In terms of strategic planning, Salon seems more akin to a 1970's state-owned entity than a cutting edge dotcom. That's because they are owned and operated by Socialists. They are just being true to their ideals.
Send them to history's unmarked graveyard of discarded lies.
To: All
Forgive me for interrupting your very important thoughts and profound wisdom, but we are in the midst of the most exciting fundraiser ever on FreeRepublic. I would hate for any of you to miss it!
Come visit us at Freepathon Holidays are Here Again: Let's Really Light Our Tree This Year - Thread 6
and be a part of something that is larger than all of us.
Alone, we are a voice crying in the wilderness. Together we are a force for positive action!
Don't be left out!
Be one who can someday say..................... "I was there when..................."
Thank you to everyone who has already come by and become a part!
To: andrew
They put their money where their mouth is.
15 posted on
12/05/2001 4:33:04 PM PST by
mrsmith
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson