Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Alberta's Child
I predicted earlier this year that the tech sector was going to rebound strongly in 2002. That forecast was based entirely on tax law and the effect that Y2K had on equipment replacement cycles. Because capital equipment can be depreciated for tax purposes over three years, businesses have an incentive to replace high-tech equipment as soon as they even think they need it. As a result, there is an expectation that in any given year approximately one out of every three computers, copiers, cell phones, etc. will be replaced.

Do you think that the PC and equipment replacement cycle are not anticipated in earnings projections? Of course they are. Here's the kicker though. There is so much spare equipment on the market that companies are basically self-insuring. Why by a new Cisco router when you can buy one on E-bay from a dot-bomb for 1/3 the cost? Also, have you noticed the PC price war? What does it mean when the anticipated volume is replaced but at lower revenues? Oh, and one more thing, do you think the tightening of the screws in capital expenditures by companies that don't want to spend any cash will impact the three year replacement cycle?

15 posted on 12/05/2001 10:47:34 AM PST by Wyatt's Torch
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]


To: Wyatt's Torch
Do you think that the PC and equipment replacement cycle are not anticipated in earnings projections?

Sure they are. The difference today is that the market is still filled with amateur investors who look backward instead of forward when it comes to pricing stocks.

The thing you have to remember in any information-based industry is that the cost of increasing productivity is very low. Compared to an industrial producer, the cost of increasing productivity is so low it almost hurts (compare, for example, the cost of doubling the speed of all your company's computers to the cost of doubling the productivity of an auto manufacturing plant). The "price wars" that you see are simply the natural result of maturing technologies with multiple manufacturers. Most of the money that is made in an industry is made when the technology is so innovative that nobody else has it. In that regard, you have to remember that the top "high-tech" stocks of 2003 may involve a bunch of products and even entire companies that don't exist now.

As economist Larry Kudlow might say: Have faith in the supply side -- have faith!

21 posted on 12/05/2001 11:02:56 AM PST by Alberta's Child
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

To: Wyatt's Torch; Alberta's Child; usconservative
I bought some RDRAM last week; prices were up compared to last month.
I'll grant you that there's way less of a glut of RDRAM, but I believe pricing power is coming back.
69 posted on 12/05/2001 1:26:43 PM PST by Oschisms
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson