Skip to comments.
"It" Gets Around (Segway/Ginger)
ABC News ^
| 12/3/01
| Antonio Mora
Posted on 12/03/2001 4:17:56 PM PST by spycatcher
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 221-236 next last
I still don't see how all the power comes from a fairly small battery. Seems the friction would be the same as a bike -- so would a bike go the same length of time with a battery and no pedaling? Will another model have a bike seat with pedaling optional (high tech unicycle/bicycle)?
To: spycatcher
But will it transform lives, cities and even thinking, as first hyped in the media? obviously NO
2
posted on
12/03/2001 4:23:08 PM PST
by
Steven W.
To: Steven W.
It will be a success though because it's fun for consumers but has serious military and business applications. Special forces are very interested and evaluating how it can be customized for troops
To: spycatcher
It doesn't matter how clever the design is, you can't violate physical principles.
For example the claim that you can't fall of because it balances itself. That balancing system consumes energy, which must come from the battery. And it will consume a lot, as the torque the rider will apply to the axle will be huge. A bicycle will be much more efficient as concerns balance, simply due to the large angular momentum possible with a large bicycle wheel. Additionally the small, and wide wheels used by 'it' require more energy to travel over an imperfect surface. For this reason a bicycle with a large, high pressure, narrow wheel requires less energy, as any bicyclist knows.
Notice also the low clearance of the 'it'. This means that a relatively small object will 'derail' it.
In addition to be inefficient, it will also be dangerous.
A battery powered bicycle would be a much better idea...and its been done, and found wanting.
This product will be purchased by a few dreamers, the rest of us will save our money.
4
posted on
12/03/2001 4:30:00 PM PST
by
Voltage
To: Voltage
"IT" reminds me of "The Roadrunner" in high speed mode. (looks the same![beep beep])
5
posted on
12/03/2001 4:33:52 PM PST
by
Goldi-Lox
To: spycatcher
An expensive toy that will be stolen at every opportunity.
6
posted on
12/03/2001 4:34:00 PM PST
by
hgro
To: Steven W.
I'm underwhelmed
To: Republic of Texas
This has been the most brilliant marketing campaign in the history of the world, followed by an expensive substitute for a Honda spree moped.
To: Voltage
I'm sure the design will change down the road and incorporate more efficient batteries. Advanced battery technology is a huge research area right now. Inefficient batteries have been the limiting factor for everything in our modern society.
To: Voltage
The only way that this can work in practice is for the "rider" to expend as much energy "rocking" the device as it would require to walk or run the same distance while the mini-battery supplies the power to balance this silly, wheeled "pogo stick"; I hope the people who have committed to purchase this have the good sense to demand guarantees of performance.
To: Voltage
I think you're wrong. I saw the tests this morning on GMA and it executed going up and over 'rough' terrain with ease. I can foresee that this transport device will change the way that delivery businesses are structured and how downtown commuters go to and from work.
To: Voltage
Hmm. Put bigger wheels on it and go four, oops, two wheeling? I think the issue of balance is addressed by several high speed gyros, hence no draw on the battery as long as they're spinning at adequate speed. I can actually see a lot of applications for this thing on campuses, military flight lines, postmen, warehouses etc. I'm not sure it will revolutionize city transportation though.
12
posted on
12/03/2001 4:47:04 PM PST
by
Arkie2
To: Voltage
True, but I see possibilities here.
To: spycatcher
"I've seen it, and it is
more important than pantyhose and it's more important than the Internet," said Metcalf This guy is an engineer for crying out loud, why would make a stupid statement like this? Kamen must've paid him money to hype this toy.
14
posted on
12/03/2001 4:50:50 PM PST
by
Brett66
To: CreekerFreeper
I think you're right. Why should we be surprised that an invention can do something that was previously thought impossible? Didn't some people from bygone years once balk at the possibility of a self-propelled vehicle? (read: automobile) Heck, there were probably cavemen who similarly doubted the wheel. Just about anything is possible once we conceive of it, and that's a fact.
To: germanshepherd
PS But I will admit, those things look pretty dorky, and the guys standing around on them do too!
To: spycatcher
Does it come with an umbrella? In the winter I'll take a dogsled anytime! Is this a high tech age or not?
To: spycatcher
I still don't see how all the power comes from a fairly small battery. It must be using the newer battery technology. Maybe lithium ion? Of course these batteries have a limited recharge capacity and will have to be replaced after a while. It will be very expensive to replace these batteries. I wonder if he figured that as part of the lifetime cost of this machine?
18
posted on
12/03/2001 4:58:19 PM PST
by
Brett66
To: Brett66
Bring on the Skycar!!
To: germanshepherd
well, look @ Bill Gates...
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 221-236 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson