Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Phyllis Schlafly: Are Mexican Immigrants Assimilating Or Invading?
Too Good Reports ^ | December 2, 2001 | Phyllis Schlafly

Posted on 11/30/2001 7:47:46 AM PST by Stand Watch Listen

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 141-160161-180181-200 ... 341-346 next last
Comment #161 Removed by Moderator

To: Joseph Warren
Anyway, it is a big columned house-- huge. Owned by a Marcos crony. He allegedly had a joint medicaid (or WHATEVER federal arm pays!)...a joint medicaid care home/casino!!!! Full sized roulette wheel and all. Hilarious!

Eeegads. Makes us more and more irate when our parents, friends parents, ect...cannot get adequate medicare coverage because there "isn't enough to fund". I saw it (questionable billings to medicare) on a smaller level, but it's that eveyone takes a piece of the pie. There are barely crumbs left, thanks to those leeches.

162 posted on 11/30/2001 4:28:32 PM PST by kstewskis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 147 | View Replies]

To: mvscal
It happened with the Irish. It happened with the Germans. It happened with the Polish and the Italians. It happened with the Chinese. Now it's happening with the Mexicans.

Amazing, isn't it that of all the nationalities you mention the Mexicans are the only to date that in their unwillingness to assimilate have had Spanish become almost an official second language. Spanish is the only language found now on government documents, banking transaction devices and most telephone answering systems.
It is not difficult to draw the inference that Mexicans do not wish to assimilate, to embrace the culture which many nationalities have contributed to nor become Americans. What I ask you gives the Mexicans the right to be so arrogant compared to all other nationalities that make up this great country.
The Mexicans are storming across the borders at a time in history after all the other immigrants have built this nation to be the greatest in history and the Mexicans are now like locusts swarming across the boarders to partake of the bounty which was achieved without their assistance.

Yes, many Americans of a vast diverse national background resent the illegals sneaking in during the night to scoop up the gravy. The American people are oh so giving but even the most generous will get fed up with hordes of ungrateful illegals that are here not as guests but have come here as 'looters' of our values, customs, traditions and the culture of many that have made us so great.
Resentment runs deeper than most folks would like to admit.

America for Americans and those that wish to become Americans!

163 posted on 11/30/2001 4:36:49 PM PST by varon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Carol-HuTex
Fox's five-year plan calls for building a larger consular presence in the United States, and this is already in operation. In U.S. areas with large Hispanic (including illegal) populations, the Mexican consul donates to the local public schools the same textbooks that are used in every elementary school in Mexico, grades 1 through 6.

You know, I have to wonder why a Mexican would want to come to the US (namely, Arizona) and have their kid educated. AZ's education is in shambles, rating #49 in the nation.

Here's an illustration. I was talking to a 7th grader, who has been here w/ her family from Mexico for 2 years. I asked her how things were going in school. She said "okay...it's all review for me". I asked her when she learned this material. She told me that she learned the current material she was studying, three years ago in Mexico. SAD! Maybe we should start telling the Mexicans that they would be better off keeping their kids there for school, don't come to Arizona!

164 posted on 11/30/2001 4:37:58 PM PST by kstewskis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 160 | View Replies]

To: varon
Very well stated.
165 posted on 11/30/2001 4:39:48 PM PST by Joe Hadenuf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 163 | View Replies]

To: mvscal
Ah yes, the typical response to the Mexican invasion of the USA. Let me ask you this, when my Irish, Welsh, and English ancestors came to America were they eligible for welfare? Were they given job finding assistance at the employment dept. in their native language? Were they given free emergency medical care? Were they given more preference points for government jobs than some military veterans? Were they eligible for Social Security and Medicare even though they hadn't paid in their fair share? Were the Irish that came to Ellis island with tuberculosis allowed into the country? Did the Welsh immigrants smuggle cocaine when they crossed the border? Did these people NOT assimilate into the AMERICAN culture after 3 or 4 generations? Did my great grandmother recieve WIC benefits once my grandfather was born (during the depression)? Who the he!! do you think pays out the nose for all of the above benefits? Is it the Mexican illegals or is it the average American taxpayer? Well, considering the fact that most of the amigos that work in the fields here in the Willamette valley are working under the table I would say that Joe sixpack is footing the bill. You sir are comparing apples to oranges. History repeats itself and the USA is currently following the Roman Empire's recipe for self destruction with the help of your Spanish speaking friends.
166 posted on 11/30/2001 4:59:20 PM PST by Tailback
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Tailback
Bump

History repeats itself and the USA is currently following the Roman Empire's recipe for self destruction with the help of your Spanish speaking friends.

I am confident that these America haters are inordinately aware of this.

167 posted on 11/30/2001 5:05:57 PM PST by Joe Hadenuf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 166 | View Replies]

To: Tailback
Hoo-Yah! Hoo-Yah!!
168 posted on 11/30/2001 5:06:21 PM PST by MAWG
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 166 | View Replies]

To: Travis McGee
I'll come out of my hole to back you up, Trav, not that you can't handle it on your own. But what's with these two, Joseph Warren (member since 11/20/01) and mvscal of Tustin, CA (member since 10/31/01, no less, home of many of my friends, btw.

mvscal should move over to San Jacinto/Hemet CA area and meet the stickiest-fingered breed in So. Cal. Daylight, night, doesn't matter - you had better have everything under lock and key or glued down. Friendly neighborhood garage sale, mothers send their tiny tots over to swipe any small item that strikes their fancy.

169 posted on 11/30/2001 5:10:33 PM PST by lakey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: mlo
There has always been some debate about what percentage of the population of the Southwest was Hispanic and how much was “Anglo” when the US acquired Texas, New Mexico, Arizona, and California. I’ve read a number of books that have said that there were more Hispanics than “Anglos” out here and that most of the Hispanics supported the US claims to the territory, since the US government was better than the Mexican government. Here in New Mexico, this territory was mostly Hispanic in those days and might still be so today.

You know, a lot of Yankees think that the battle of the Alamo was a battle between Mexicans and white settlers from the East, but it wasn’t. Many, perhaps most, of those white settlers had intermarried with Hispanic settlers, and so early Texas was made up of many mixed-race people. I say “mixed-race” because many Mexicans are a mix of Spanish and Indians. Once Cortez landed in 1519, the mixing began. (Actually, it began earlier. Cortez found Spanish men married to Mayan women when he stopped off at Yucatan. The men were from earlier explorer’s ships.)

Did you know that all of Central America, from Guatemala to Panama, was part of Mexico in the early 19th Century, and that each country now was a former state in Mexico? The main reason Mexico gave up the Southwestern U.S. and Central America was because it didn’t have a large enough military to maintain and hold that much territory.

And of course you know that Mexico used to belong to Spain. Are we going to run history backwards for a while? Is Mexico going to give California back to Spain?

MAP

CALIFORNIA HISTORY

”Mexican Period

“When Mexico fought and obtained independence, California lost virtually all its centralized support. As members of an isolated community, Californios spent three decades in political confusion (at one point, a Californio-based republic was declared). The richest families turned to the one industry guaranteed to earn a comfortable living -- selling hides and tallow generated from the virtually free cattle that roamed vast ranchos. In an attempt to increase the non-Indian population, foreigners of all types were admitted. Soon a sizable minority of Yankees grew, dominating the merchant class and entering into important positions in the political and social structure.

“The Bear Flag Revolt and the Mexican-American War

“The defense of California, completely neglected by Mexico and lacking support from unstable Californio administrations, led to the unusual condition where any of several world powers could have easily occupied California. In point of fact, the Yankee residents themselves were the first to do it, in the Bear Flag revolt of June 1846. Just one month after, due to the Mexican-American war that in turn stemmed from the Yankee takeover of Texas, the American Navy took control of California without firing a shot. Most Californios were resigned to inevitable Yankee rule, though a revolt at Los Angeles led to a pocket of Californio resistance lasting from September 1846 to January 1847.

“Achieving Statehood

“California was officially made a territory with the end of the Mexican-American war February 2, 1848, nine days before gold was discovered at Sutter's Mill. Through some local PR efforts, and support in late 1848 from President Polk himself, a gold mania swept the States and the world resulting in the remarkable 49er migration. The population soared, quickly (and brutally) overwhelming the Californios and Indians. Political leaders seized the moment to obtain a constitution and voter's ratification by November 1849, with recognition by the U.S. congress in October 1850. Meanwhile, the great influx of miners was redirected to farming, trade, and business. The beauty, richness, and climate of California -- as well as a lack of options for bankrupt miners -- kept the population here long after the gold mania died down. The State of California, a chaotic mix of ethnicities and incomes, hopes and cynicism, was born.”

170 posted on 11/30/2001 5:15:06 PM PST by Fred25
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 153 | View Replies]

To: Fred25
The State of California, a chaotic mix of ethnicities and incomes, hopes and cynicism, was born.”

(quoting Led Zepplin)

...."and the song remains the same"....great post!

171 posted on 11/30/2001 5:24:09 PM PST by kstewskis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 170 | View Replies]

To: jpsb
I'm happy you see that earlier immagrants had to have a much greater commitment to becomming American by virtue of knowing where was no going back.

There has always been a fairly good number of immigrants who decide that the U.S. isn't for them, and head back to the "old country." Ellis Island has an exhibit at their museum about this phenomenon.

172 posted on 11/30/2001 5:36:04 PM PST by NYCVirago
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: Joseph Warren
...And Bush won, even though rotund Yvette Loranzo (wasn't that her sweetnesses name?), democrat of Texas, went to prison.

You're reaching here with that comment. Her ethnic background is irrelevant.

173 posted on 11/30/2001 5:43:54 PM PST by NYCVirago
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: NYCVirago
" Her ethnic background is irrelevant." Just how did he refer to her ethnic background? And, your wrong anyway. Our ethnicity is most relevant. To a very large extent, it is who we are. I am very comfortable being around people that I grew up with and share culture with. That is normal.
174 posted on 11/30/2001 6:08:42 PM PST by MAWG
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 173 | View Replies]

To: MAWG
Just how did he refer to her ethnic background? And, your wrong anyway. Our ethnicity is most relevant. To a very large extent, it is who we are. I am very comfortable being around people that I grew up with and share culture with. That is normal.

Here is what Joseph Warren wrote:

Mistakes" have been made along the way? ...Such as the 15% felons Gorebot and Meissner made democrat voters?

...Such as the aggressive leftist 1965 immigration law which morphed a merit-based, generally educated immigrant class to a teeming third world horde.

Oh well, Rome was invaded by barbarians, and the Germans turned out OK. They produced Bach and Goethe, and fine machinery. As a matter of fact, about two thirds of Americans (used) to be descended in part from Germans.

...And Bush won, even though rotund Yvette Loranzo (wasn't that her sweetnesses name?), democrat of Texas, went to prison.

That's a pretty clear reference to her ethnicity. Why make a reference to Yvette Lozano in that post, unless he was trying to make the point that she did what she did because she is of Mexican descent? Her ethnic background *is* irrelevant -- there are slimy Democrats all over; why make a point of her, unless it is to prove some point that Mexican-Americans are disloyal?

175 posted on 11/30/2001 6:45:21 PM PST by NYCVirago
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 174 | View Replies]

To: mvscal
How about this for modern history, pal.I moved to Ventura in September 1983. At that time, Oxnard Ca. was 20% Mexican primarily because there are a lot of farms out this way. Now Oxnard is 65-70% Mexican.The crime rate has increased 120%...the homicide rate is up 260%....gangbangers abound and older people are afraid to go out at night. Pretty little homes in 1983 are now slums by the HUNDREDS,and property values have plummeted.Don't spread your drivel here. I invite Jim Rob here to my area, and I will PROVE it.
176 posted on 11/30/2001 6:55:51 PM PST by 1 FELLOW FREEPER
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: LIBERTARIAN JOE
Your #91 - How tue. Do you see any lawyers, doctors, or engineers crossing the border? Nope. Only the trailer trash fom Mexico. They come here looking for freebie handouts and they get plenty of it from We the People. It is easy to enslave them as they are usually uneducated and unskilled. Remember, minimum wage isn't what MUST be paid, it is all that WILL be paid.
177 posted on 11/30/2001 7:08:07 PM PST by PatrioticAmerican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies]

To: BlackbirdSST
I'd like to meet him, but I don't think he wants to meet me.
178 posted on 11/30/2001 7:17:18 PM PST by Travis McGee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 144 | View Replies]

To: Joe Hadenuf
Very true, "racist" is their ultimate fall-back accusation, but it's getting worn pretty thin, a trump card that keeps coming out of the sleeve. It only works while the rest of us can be cowed into buying it, and lots of us aren't any more.
179 posted on 11/30/2001 7:21:29 PM PST by Travis McGee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 151 | View Replies]

To: lakey
Where is Tustin CA?
180 posted on 11/30/2001 7:24:41 PM PST by Travis McGee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 169 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 141-160161-180181-200 ... 341-346 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson