[alcuin]

I feel as if I'm back with Gargantua.

Dar, on this THREAD the issue (just one of--what?--666?) of merely being present on an anti-FR board was NEVER the complaint; the behaviour of those on the given AF board WAS. I do not support banning or nuking or the "FReeper since" crap, and the idea of scrutinizing FR, "even" with extreme negative bias doesn't disturb me (it can take the heat) but, logically, if someone posts ANYWHERE it's fair game. Fair GAME, nothing more. Not credentials, just accountabilty within the teapot.

You know, Jai predicted this thread . . I forget what the astrological consensus was . .

[unsycophant]

You seem to be doing a good job of keeping up, and you're right about it being a fair game. Free Republic CAN hold up to the scrutiny. There's no rule saying that the same scrutiny can't apply to other sites. It's a bit hard to take anyone seriously when they stand to the side of the fire, while holding someone else's feet in it.