Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Human Cloning a Reminder of Nazis, Says Orthodox
Zenit ^ | 28-Nov-2001 | ZENIT.org News Agency

Posted on 11/28/2001 7:45:29 AM PST by patent

28-Nov-2001 -- ZENIT.org News Agency
ZENIT material may not be reproduced without permission. Permission can be requested at info@zenit.org

HUMAN CLONING A REMINDER OF NAZIS, SAYS ORTHODOX

Reaction to U.S. Company´s Announcement

ROME, (Zenit.org).- The human cloning experiment announced in the United States brings to mind the "crimes against humanity of a Nazi brand," says an Orthodox Church leader.

"The destruction of an embryo is equivalent to an abortion, in other words, a homicide," said Father Antoni Ilin, a spokesman for the Orthodox Patriarchate of Moscow.

"We condemn human cloning, whether for therapeutic or reproductive ends," he said. "From the moment of conception, the embryo is invested with human dignity and blessed with the gift of life. So-called therapeutic cloning is nothing other than the worst instrumentalization of a human being, sacrificed for the benefit of others."

On Sunday, a U.S. firm, Advanced Cell Technology, announced it had cloned an embryonic human being but later destroyed it.

For its part, the Union of Muslim Communities in Italy stated: "We simply and absolutely condemn any attempt to modify or imitate creation."

"Even if they say that they do not intend reproductive but therapeutic cloning, they are sorcerer´s apprentices who don´t know where they will end up," the secretary of the Union, Roberto Hamza, said. "It is a defiance against God that will lead to grave disasters."

The new chief rabbi of Rome, physician Riccardo Di Segni, commented that he was following very closely "all progress related to procreation techniques and the possible applications in the human realm. Anguishing scenarios emerge, which are difficult to control and, therefore, extreme caution is necessary."


TOPICS: Culture/Society; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: abortionlist; catholiclist; clonelist; michaeldobbs
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-135 next last
To: BMCDA
Apparently they had no scruple to use the V2 rockets of von Braun to fly into space ;-)

Actually there were a number of people who opposed using the V-2 rockets or even allowing the rocket team (von Braun, et. al.), into the country. The eventual decision was that the Vengeance weapons were no different in moral principle from other forms of the bombardment of civilian targets. There has not been much controversy when it comes to suppressing the results of Mengele's work -- hardly anyone opposes the surpression.

41 posted on 11/28/2001 12:48:57 PM PST by Lucius Cornelius Sulla
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: BMCDA
Apparently they had no scruple to use the V2 rockets of von Braun to fly into space ;-)

Actually there were a number of people who opposed using the V-2 rockets or even allowing the rocket team (von Braun, et. al.), into the country. The eventual decision was that the Vengeance weapons were no different in moral principle from other forms of the bombardment of civilian targets. There has not been much controversy when it comes to suppressing the results of Mengele's work -- hardly anyone opposes the surpression.

42 posted on 11/28/2001 12:49:29 PM PST by Lucius Cornelius Sulla
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: SoothingDave
Transplants and antibiotics are good. They do no harm to anyone and they help people live better lives.

And if the practice of destroying embryos were ended, the same could be said about IVF.

Some people are infertile and always will be. You can't always get what you want.

The problem is when you can get what you want, but busybodies step in to prevent you from getting it.

It is not an end run around the natural functioning of the body. IVF is.

No, IVF is an end run around the disfunctioning of the body.

Are you denying that cloning technology is sitting on top of the shoulders of the entire IVF, articifical reproductive technology industry?

Of course not. It's just that I don't start from the premise that that industry is inherently evil.

Folks will lose a child in an accident and then "clone" him to try to make a new "Timmy."

That's their prerogative. People often have children to "replace" lost siblings even today. It's pathetic, but hardly a disaster.

A Woody Allen type will clone his wife and then dump her when his daughter/wife starts to remind him more of the girl he fell in love with.

Under any scenario, cloned humans would have the same legal status as any other human being. It's up to the clone whether she wants to date the old fart when she's of age. If for some reason cloned humans do end up being chattel slaves, that's a political problem with a political solution, and in no way a technological problem.

People will abort their accidental "natural" babies in order to order the latest genetically pure baby from Sears.

Like Gattica, "naturally" conceived people will be relegated to second class status, as they will be deemed too short lived to be worth the bother of educating.

These last two suggest to me that you aren't really sure of what clones are.

43 posted on 11/28/2001 12:58:45 PM PST by Physicist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: SoothingDave
Are you denying that cloning technology is sitting on top of the shoulders of the entire IVF, articifical reproductive technology industry?

I can deny this part. Cloning technology is how all the diagnostic tests for blood screening in the world have been manufactured for over 20 years. Almost all diagnostic testing in medicine is dependent on cloning technology for its manufacture. It turns out that once you start cloning mice or rabbits, someone wants to try it on people.

To the rest of the argument I think its a matter of degree. The process that occurs when a person takes an antibiotic has nothing to with how the immune system functions. The make-up of the organisms in the body after taking antibiotics shifts away from benign bacteria to more virulent species. A significant percentage of the 100,000 or so people who die in hospitals every year are killed in this manner. I think vaccines are more along the line of what you were thinking.

44 posted on 11/28/2001 12:59:44 PM PST by <1/1,000,000th%
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Physicist
I hereby invoke the Godwin clause.

As in the Godwin who was the father of Mary Shelley, the actual creator of "Frankenstein's Monster". How appropriate.

45 posted on 11/28/2001 1:05:35 PM PST by Lucius Cornelius Sulla
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Lucius Cornelius Sulla
No, the USENET Godwin.
46 posted on 11/28/2001 1:13:56 PM PST by BMCDA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: BMCDA
Not very knowledgeable on Usenet. Please cite or provide a link.
47 posted on 11/28/2001 1:15:47 PM PST by Lucius Cornelius Sulla
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: Physicist
Transplants and antibiotics are good. They do no harm to anyone and they help people live better lives.

And if the practice of destroying embryos were ended, the same could be said about IVF.

You have a point. Unfortunately, as it is practiced today the two are intertwined. I am much less inclined to rally against such things if I don't believe that innocent life is being wasted.

If a pure IVF could be done withouth surplus embryos or abortion then I would consider it more like adultery than murder. And we all know it is futile to try to imprison adulterers.

Some people are infertile and always will be. You can't always get what you want.

The problem is when you can get what you want, but busybodies step in to prevent you from getting it.

As I stated just above, if the destruction of embryos were not involved I would be more open to the idea. As it is I am not calling for a ban on IVF. Cloning may require some more study before we sanction or not it.

People will abort their accidental "natural" babies in order to order the latest genetically pure baby from Sears.

Like Gattica, "naturally" conceived people will be relegated to second class status, as they will be deemed too short lived to be worth the bother of educating.

These last two suggest to me that you aren't really sure of what clones are.

You are correct that these two are not representative of "cloning," per se. They are however nightmare scenarios of the future of genetic engineering. Once we know how to artificially create embryos, we have the opportunity to replace the genetic material with that of another. This si cloning. Once we have this skill done pat, you can be assured that tampering with the genetic code to get the desired results will follow.

First it will be to get rid of birth defects, or future heart trouble, or something like that. Then alcoholism and obesity and such. Then for the right eyes, hair color, chin, or IQ.

SD

48 posted on 11/28/2001 1:17:09 PM PST by SoothingDave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: SoothingDave
Very well said. I agree with you completely. We as a human race have learned well how to destroy anything that we don't want but we have not learned how to take care of what we have created naturally.
49 posted on 11/28/2001 1:31:44 PM PST by .45MAN
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Lucius Cornelius Sulla
Here are many of them.
50 posted on 11/28/2001 1:35:31 PM PST by BMCDA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

Comment #51 Removed by Moderator

To: SoothingDave
Once we have this skill done pat, you can be assured that tampering with the genetic code to get the desired results will follow.

First it will be to get rid of birth defects, or future heart trouble, or something like that. Then alcoholism and obesity and such. Then for the right eyes, hair color, chin, or IQ.

That's a separate topic, but an interesting one. Read this thread if you want my views on that topic.

52 posted on 11/28/2001 1:57:07 PM PST by Physicist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

Comment #53 Removed by Moderator

To: Yehuda; onyx; angelo; Romulus
unfortunately, we haven't figure out how to ban the cloning of bigoted morons on FR...
If you are going to call a man a nasty name you could at least have the nerve to say it to him.

patent  +AMDG

54 posted on 11/28/2001 2:12:15 PM PST by patent
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

Comment #55 Removed by Moderator

To: Physicist
I think that you hold human nature much higher than it really is... You must remember that we are descendants of Cain not Abel. Just look around you will see that we tend to flow to our lowest point in humanity. We are not intrinsically good; if we were we would all be living together and sharing everything.
56 posted on 11/28/2001 2:58:07 PM PST by .45MAN
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: Physicist
Cardinal Trujillo affirmed that "the therapeutic intent does not change the fact that this is about the production of embryos who will be destroyed."

When you state in post 14 that the Cardinal is "disengenuous" and that you don't believe that he believes what he is saying, I'm afraid I'm lost as to the reasoning behind this opinion.

All Catholic clergy spend every waking minute trying to stem the tide of merciless and brutal murder of the unborn. I find all of his comments regarding the abomination of cloning and the end result that is murder to be entirely within the context of his beliefs.

57 posted on 11/28/2001 3:01:29 PM PST by dansangel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Physicist; Lucius Cornelius Sulla
I hereby invoke the Godwin clause.

This is slightly off topic so please indulge me for a moment. The Godwin Law and usenet terms as "troll", the meaning of which I am now learning after some years in the biz, and learning reluctantly I might add, since I prefer to remain not an insider, such terms and traditions seem to reflect the strict, inflexible mindsets of engineers and scientifically minded users who have dominated Usenet. (You have seen those, haven't you? I've seen these mindsets in the software engineers I've worked with, and who are we kidding, in myself as well. Professional hazards, you might say.) Paradoxically though, they (the terms and traditions) apply to behaviour patterns which have traditionally been best described by humanistic disciplines, psychology, sociology, literature.

And now I see these terms and insults being applied in that strict engineering manner with no room for any disagreement or negotiation. Which leads me to say Physicist, that in this particular discussion the references to Nazism fit like a glove and are being supported by specific historical references.

58 posted on 11/28/2001 3:30:31 PM PST by Revolting cat!
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: dansangel
When you state in post 14 that the Cardinal is "disengenuous" and that you don't believe that he believes what he is saying, I'm afraid I'm lost as to the reasoning behind this opinion.

The priest I was referring to was Father Antoni Ilin, who was quoted first in the original article, not the Cardinal. The quote I specifically mentioned,

"From the moment of conception, the embryo is invested with human dignity and blessed with the gift of life,"

illustrates what I mean. If he thought that a clone was invested with the same human dignity as any other embryo, he wouldn't have singled it out of the many millions of others. Had the baby been brought to term, I'm sure he would have objected even more strongly.

59 posted on 11/28/2001 3:39:09 PM PST by Physicist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: Physicist
I'm sorry for misunderstanding. However, I still must find fault with the rationale behind your statement. Father Ilin, as a holy cleric of the Catholic Church, would celebrate the life of an embryo (I disagree with the use of that term as it is used to de-humanize a life - see post #11) rather than "object" to it. He would not want to see any more of them artificially created, however, due to the endless possibilities of abuse, misuse and even murder.

Just as the use of adult stem cells has shown success rendering the need to "grow" humans for that purpose unnecessary, there are many sources of tissue, organs, "replacement parts" if you will, from selfless people who agree to be donors upon their deaths.

I think we should campaign to have more people volunteer to be donors rather than create more human beings to be used for that express reason.

60 posted on 11/28/2001 3:55:55 PM PST by dansangel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-135 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson