Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: A.J.Armitage
"Leaving that aside, you've gone on at length that the president is commander in chief of the military and the militia, when in the actual service of the United States (I notice you truncated the quotation to leave that off). No one disputed this, and it does exactly nothing to prove your point."

On the contrary, military trials are military affairs. Military affairs are subordinate to the Executive Branch, per Article II, Section 2 of the U.S. Constitution.

One would have to claim that military tribunals are not military affairs to consistently believe otherwise (i.e., to hold the belief that military tribunals were not subordinate to the Executive Branch), and that begs the question of the very definition of "military"...

139 posted on 12/02/2001 5:55:35 PM PST by Southack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 137 | View Replies ]


To: Southack
On the contrary, military trials are military affairs.

The fact that they're military neither means we have to have them nor does it mean they have to be used in some unclear category of cases. Until you decide to move them out of the civilian courts, they aren't involved with the military in any way.

141 posted on 12/02/2001 6:54:33 PM PST by A.J.Armitage
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 139 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson