[barf]

Do I have to explain simple trig to you? Unless you are totally stupid, you saw two returns per sweep. Connect the long spans together and you will note that each set runs parallel with the track of the P3. Connect the short spans together and they do not run parallel with the P3 track. So guess what, Einstein, the long spans are the tow line between the two symbols which represent the P3 and the 'sled'. Is our NTSB too incompetent to have not seen this or are they only dishonest? They tried to mask this with Exhibit 13B which likely proves that they are not incompetent, only dishonest. The heads of the NTSB were the crooks who told the lies.

[Rokke]

"Do I have to explain simple trig to you? Unless you are totally stupid, you saw two returns per sweep. Connect the long spans together and you will note that each set runs parallel with the track of the P3."

No trig required. Here is the data broken down for you:

Data # / X axis / Y axis / Time
1. 22.137 / -7.188 / 1807.75
2. 22.009 / -7.322 / 1811.75
3. 21.265 / -7.943 / 1819.75
4. 21.138 / -8.06 / 1823.75
5. 20.519 / -8.697 / 1831.75
6. 20.393 / -8.831 / 1835.75

I could go on, but you get the picture. 1 and 2 are your first "double return". Note the timing differential. 3 and 4 are the second. Again, note the time. Also note that it takes 12 seconds from 1 to 3. But only 4 between 1 and 2, and 3 and 4. See, no trig required. Just simple math. Now maybe you can explain how a radar sweeping 360 degrees every 12 seconds could identify something as close as your "double returns" with 4 seconds between hits. It ain't going to happen.

By the way, this data comes from that great icon of TWA800 missile conspiracy kooks, the late CMDR Donaldson. It was good enough for him. Apparently, you know better.