Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Marines Have Landed — Again!
Toogood Reports ^ | November 27, 2001 | Col. David H. Hackworth

Posted on 11/27/2001 6:16:33 AM PST by Starmaker

The first non-Special Ops unit deployed to Afghanistan is the U.S. Marines Corps — no big surprise to this old Army doggie.

In World War II's South Pacific, Marines were "the firstus with the mostus" into the Solomons, and they led the way into Vietnam. In Korea, they landed second, but unlike the Army units initially deployed there, Gen. Edward Craig's Marine brigade hit the beach ready to fight. And without their skill, sacrifice and courage, the beleaguered Eighth Army would've been pushed into the sea during the early months of the conflict. A similar scenario occurred during the early stages of Desert Storm, in which Marine units came in ready to fight while the first Army troops — the 82nd Airborne Division, with its insufficient anti-tank capability — were a potential speed bump waiting to be flattened.

The Corps, which has never lost sight that its primary mission is to fight, remains superbly trained and disciplined — true to its time-honored slogan "We don't promise a rose garden." When, under Clinton, the Army lowered its standards to Boy Scout summer-camp level in order to increase enlistment, the Corps responded by making boot training longer and tougher. Now under USMC Commandant James Jones, that training has gotten even meaner for the young Marine wannabes waiting in line to join up, as well as for Leathernecks already serving in regular and reserve units.

Unlike U.S. Army conventional units — their new slogan, "An Army of One," says it all — the U.S. Marine Corps remains a highly mobile, fierce fighting team that has never forgotten: "The more sweat on the training field, the less blood on the battlefield."

The Marines are flexible, agile, ready and deadly, while the Army remains configured to fight the Soviets — who disappeared off the Order of Battle charts a decade ago. For example, right after Sept. 11, the two Army heavy divisions in Germany — with their 68-ton tanks that can crush almost every bridge they cross — deployed to Poland for war games.

Hello, is there a brain at the top somewhere beneath that snazzy Black Beret being modeled at most U.S. airports by too many overweight Army National Guard troops?

The Army has eight other regular divisions, all designed to fight 20th-century wars. Three are heavy — Tank and Mech Infantry — and two are light, the storied 82nd Airborne and the elite 101st Airborne (now helicopter), and then there's the light/heavy 10,000-man 2nd Division that's in Korea backing up a million-man, superbly fit South Korean Army.

Less the light divisions, our Army's not versatile, deployable, swift or sustainable. The heavy units require fleets of ships and planes to move them, and it takes months to get them there — it took Stormin' Norman six months to ready a force for Desert Storm. The 101st — while deadly, as Desert Storm proved — is also a slow mover requiring a huge amount of strategic lift — ships and giant planes — to get to the battlefield, not to mention the massive tax-dollar load to outfit and maintain it.

Sadly, today's Army is like a street fighter with brass knuckles too heavy to lift.

After the Rangers' disaster in Somalia — where there were no tanks to break through to relieve them — and the embarrassment of not being able to fight in the war in Serbia, Army Chief of Staff Eric Shinseki started forming light brigades strikingly similar to USMC units. When I asked, "Why the copycatting?" an Army officer said: "It was either copy or go out of business. We'd become redundant because of long-term lack of boldness and imagination at the top."

The Army costs about $80 billion a year to run. It's time for Congress to do its duty and stop enjoying the benefits of all the pork this obsolescence and redundancy provides. If the Army can't change with the times — as the powerful horse cavalry generals couldn't just prior to World War II — then it should fold up its tents and turn the ground-fighting mission over to the Marines.

The law of nature is simple: survival of the fittest. And in the 21st century, heartbreaking as it is for me to admit, the forward-based and highly deployable U.S. Marine Corps is the fittest.


TOPICS: Editorial; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS:

1 posted on 11/27/2001 6:16:33 AM PST by Starmaker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Starmaker
SEMPER FI!!! HACK!!!
2 posted on 11/27/2001 6:26:39 AM PST by xkaydet65
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: xkaydet65
OOOoooohhhh raaahhhHHHH.....
3 posted on 11/27/2001 6:28:01 AM PST by Toidylop
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Starmaker
While I think Colonel Hackworth is being a little too critical of our Army, as a Parris Island Marine, I do agree that the U.S. Marine Corps has by far the most rigorous basic training of all the services. I've heard stories about Army basic training. It's basically a summer camp compared to what the Marines go through. And it makes all the difference!
4 posted on 11/27/2001 6:36:23 AM PST by SamAdams76
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SamAdams76
Many here were whining LOUDLY about the reduction (elimination?) of the tanks, and yet this is exactly what Hackworth points to as needed. I think a combination is appropriate, about 2/3 light vehicles and 1/3 tanks.
5 posted on 11/27/2001 6:41:19 AM PST by LS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Starmaker
Hack, a self-professed Army doggie, has always been a big supporter of "The Few, The Proud".Semper Fi
6 posted on 11/27/2001 6:43:40 AM PST by LavaDog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SamAdams76
I went through Parris Island in 1975. That training has stuck with me ever since. I am now full-time Army National Guard (overweight with a silly beret, lol), and by what I hear from new recruits, I could easily go through Army basic training today. Aint NO WAY IN HELL I could make it through Marine boot camp today.
7 posted on 11/27/2001 6:52:22 AM PST by fnord
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: SamAdams76
When I was a soldier, I was an armor soldier (hence my 'nineteen_kilo' handle). Despite my love for armored warfare, I think Hack has it about right: we need to be able to grapple with the enemy swiftly and violently, around the globe. For that, masses of armor just won't cut it. I suspect that we should rely more on attack helicopters for the 'speed and shock' role that was the domain of armor in the wars of the 20th century.

Thank God for the United States Marines.

8 posted on 11/27/2001 8:13:12 AM PST by Nineteen_Kilo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson