Are all Democrats Idiots? Or are all Idiots Democrats?

[Lower55]

Which is it?

[Cobra64]

Which came first the chicken or the egg?

Let me check my Democratic sex ed. manual.... Looks like the rooster did?

[JoJo the Clown]

You said: "There are two types of people in this country: givers and takers. Democrats are takers." I think there are two kinds of people in this country: Those that divide everything into two groups and those that don't.

[ladyinred]

I agree with you. It is both.

Any democrat who gets educated about the real agenda of the democrats-------Leaves, and then redeems him/herself.

[mlocher]

i don't understand the relevance of the question. it is like asking, "is the city of baltimore the city of baltimore?" or "is the city of baltimore the city of baltimore?". please clarify.

[freeforall]

Like Ronald Reagan. I see these demos on the Sunday shows and think these guys are so lame then a puby responds and it seems he's afraid to debate these screaming socialists.

[oyez]

I disagree with the concept. Democrats have learned to use the US Treasury to their advantage. They have learned to vote money out of public funds for their own use. The rest of us have to work for it.

[Young Werther]

Is this a trick question?

[operation clinton cleanup]

Which came first, the chicken or the egg?

[outpost44]

You guys aren't fair....Stupid people need a party too...

[F16Fighter]

"I think there are two types of people in this country. Those who divide everything into two groups, and those who don't."

There is also a philosophy called, "moral relativism" which abides by the notion that there is no absolute "right" or "wrong."

Is that the gist of your statement?

[Ragtime Cowgirl]

Democrats have learned to use the US Treasury to their advantage.

And most of us have a conscience and call that stealing. (^:

[razorback-bert]

That begs the question, are all ex's democrats?

[tank_sherman]

I think it was Mark Twain who wrote:

If a man is not a liberal at 20 -- he has no heart.
If a man is still a liberal at 40 -- he has no head.

[Clintons Are White Trash]

How timely this thread is - I just got off the phone with(rather I hung up on) my sister - a staunch and blind, idiotic, kool-aid drinking Democrat.

She started off on the economy...it's all Bush's fault, it's going to hell in a handbasket her husband has had 2 paycuts recently ( could it be he is semi-incompetent??). From there it went down hill and ended when she said Barbara Olsen "got hers". I told her that like a lot of other Democrats I have seen in action she is crass, cruel and completely lacking in character. I am stunned!!! It finally degenerated into my asking her at the top of my voice how she could worship a man who got blow jobs in the office of the President of the United States and lied to a grand jury about it....her response was to ask me how I could worship a man who got a 15 year old pregnant and made her get an abortion. Where do they get this crap?????? And how do they get by with it???? I can't believe my sister is so totally blind and ignorant to all of this. And she was supposed to be the smart one...

[JoJo the Clown]

The gist of my statement is that the world is filled with people who believe there are two kinds of people in the world. Catch my drift? But what do I know? I am just a clown, and a poor one at that.

[Tex_GOP_Cruz]

This is my first reply on FR (I've been a lurker for several months though.) Anyhow, I think that Democrats can be AT MOST two of the following: 1. Intelligent 2. Well-informed 3. Honest There are certainly nice but misinformed people who are RATs (3), and many RAT politicians are intelligent but sneaky (1+2). You might even get some RATs that have reason and are honest (1+3), but they form opinions based on deceptive information. I challenge someone to think of a RAT that meets all three requirements.

[MistrX]

All Democrats are idiots. Some idiots are just retarded.

[jackbill]

Are all Democrats Idiots? Or are all Idiots Democrats?

Actually, the two statements are not mutually exclusive. In fact, both can be, and are nearly correct. The first statement is absolutely correct, the second, as evidenced by some here on FR, is questionable - but mostly correct.

[JoJo the Clown]

I know many very intelligent Democrats. But then, I hang out with people of above-average intelligence. Maybe you just don't hang out with anyone intelligent. Could that be your problem? But then, I am a clown, so what do I know?

[Torie]

Some Democrats are a hell of a lot smarter than some Republicans. You underestimate them at your peril.