Posted on 11/25/2001 9:03:32 AM PST by The Duke
I've been watching Tony Snow this morning on the Fox News channel interview supposed military affairs expert Dr. Ken Adelman about current world events. As the two went out of their way to denegrate the significance of Russia on the world stage, I couldn't help but ponder for a moment the ambition that is required for any nation to produce a submarine like the Kursk.
I also find it interesting how any pundit who discusses the "once-superpower" status of Russia seems to squirm just the tiniest bit.
One finds oneself wondering in what other dangerous areas the Russians continue to expand militarily...and exactly to what extent Russia has in reality become less of a threat to the US(?)
If the definition of "superpower" is a nation that has the ability to strike a tremendous blow, then Russia should be considered as such, however if the defninition of "superpower" is the ability to *sustain* a large-scale military campaign then Russia falls short.
Interesting, though, how the pundits and our leadership seems to go out of their way to consistently avoid the first definition.
Also, it's interesting to contemplate how a nation fitting the first definition has tremendous potential for international extortion if nothing else. It makes a person wonder of all the "aid" we send to Russia might be perceived as extortion payments.
I agree.
The programs that were developed were based upon good science and many stolen US technologies. However, the subs mostly were and are major POS's I would get on a Soviet era boat while it was tied to the pier. They added new meaning to the term "pigboat" especially the older ones. You can buy an old Soviet diesel boat for about $500k US on the internet.
BTW the russian economy is reported to be about the size of Connecticut's currently - not so hot.
Any nation with the nuclear arsenal and nuclear delivery capabilities of Russia is still a "superpower" until such time as that nuclear arsenal and delivery capability rusts away and is no longer operational.
To call Russia a "once-superpower" until the latter occurs is dangerous self-delusion.
That is my contribution to enlightening the situation.
Bada-bing.
They are also broke. As in can't pay the rent.
They have oil. We need oil.
Bush just made a deal with Putin. Celebrate!
This is why we will always win. Its not the weapon but the man who wields it. They had high tech material during their Afghan incursion. They didn't have the men with the training to win that war when the main concern of the men was "where is my next jolt of Vodka coming from?" I suggest that you read the book "Mig Pilot", (I believe that's the title), which chronicles the career and defection of a MIG-25 pilot in the middle 70s. The most telling story was of how the MIGs would be unable to fly because the hydraulic fluid, (because of the northern climate the Russians had chosen to use alcohol as their hydraulic fluid since it maintained its viscosity) was constantly being drunk(en) by the military men!!!The story about the visiting general and the planting of trees and application of green paint on the trees when they died before the general arrived. It's right out of Alice in Wonderland.
They can build all those pretty toys but it ain't gonna help. They're not paying their sceientist/technicians either. This is why President Bush's offer of friendship may be our most important anti-terrorist policy.
Bada Boom! Hang it! Fire!
check out Jim Thompson- Killer Inside Me, After Dark My Sweet- bloody minded stuff.
I like Ellroy, except he seems to take a perverse pleasure in getting almost *everything* related to firearms wrong.
number one gun- nuns & orphans in the open- three rounds Willie P...
Sh*t! Where's that fuse wrench!
Thanks for the tips on the books. Amazon.com will be happier for you today!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.