Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 11/24/2001 11:59:07 AM PST by america-rules
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: america-rules
No !
2 posted on 11/24/2001 12:02:28 PM PST by america-rules
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: america-rules
Yes, it does seem to be a psychosis.
3 posted on 11/24/2001 12:02:57 PM PST by anniegetyourgun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: america-rules
It's simply the usual liberal spin. Clinton signed record number of executive orders, abused the FBI and the IRS, fired every U.S. Attorney in the country, fired the FBI director ostensibly because his wife used a government helicopter to transport firewood (coincidentally, the day before Vince Foster's body turned up), and put huge amounts of land into conservation unilaterally, and they said nothing about any of that. He didn't even have an emergency to offer as an excuse, and his thugs actually boasted about it: "Stroke of the pen, law of the land. Cool." But if Bush so much as breathes, the media are on his case.

Is anyone really surprised? Our so-called free press is probably more dishonest than Pravda in the time of Stalin.

5 posted on 11/24/2001 12:11:20 PM PST by Cicero
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: america-rules
This is flat out bull. FDR was much worse, but he was a Democrat so he got a free pass.
6 posted on 11/24/2001 12:13:58 PM PST by pray4liberty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: america-rules
Is the President a "Dictator"?

I think a more appropriate question is "Is the NYT primarily comprised of domestic enemies ?"

7 posted on 11/24/2001 12:16:25 PM PST by a_witness
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: america-rules
Rubish!!!!
9 posted on 11/24/2001 12:19:48 PM PST by jos65
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: america-rules
Put simply, the people currently accusing the president of "dictatorship" do not know what they're talking about. That they are eager to talk anyway; that they are prepared to entertain a dystopian fantasy about their democratic government; that they are willing to "spell it with a K," as we used to say back in the 1960s . . . well, that is a question we would prefer to leave to the psychiatrists.

Thank you for posting this excellent and factual article.

Some of us have been saying the same thing for weeks but David Tell lays out the facts so clearly as to make it impossible to deny them. This won't deter the Bush-haters and tin-foil hat people from babbling on about how Bush is a dictator and we're all gonna die in some dungeon somewhere but it's a great piece to use as a reminder them of the facts of the situation.

They may run from the truth but they can't hide.

11 posted on 11/24/2001 12:32:59 PM PST by Jim Scott
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: america-rules
I "borrowed" this.All this stuff wouldn't seem so bad if it was aimed at FOREIGNORS.But the laws are aimed at US,US CITIZANS,thats what is troubling.
The Attack on the World Trade Center and the Pentagon was not the first time in history that destruction has prompted greater government powers to provide the people with "safety".Such a scenario goes back to the burning of Rome under Neros rule.

Lets look at a more recent example. On February 27 1933 (shortly after Hitler became Chancellor),the Reichstag building was set afire.Although it remains unclear whether the fire was set by a communist saboteur or a Nazi agent provocateur,the Nazis capitalized on it. Insisting the fire prefigured a communist onslaught against the German state,Hitler persuaded President Hindenburg to sign an "EMERGENCY" decree suspending CONSTITUTIONAL LIBERTIES and allowing the state to exercise extraordinary powers in the name of "PUBLIC SAFETY".

Of course we all know the eventual result of that action.The number of "WAR CASUALTIES"and German citizens who lost their lives in the extermination camps(most of those exterminated were in fact German citizens,just not the MAJORITY) far exceeded any who may have died as a result of domestic terrorism.

As was the inevitable case when FREEDOM is lost,The greatest number of deaths came at the hands of "OPPRESSIVE GOVERNMENT".

Today we face a double threat.Not only is radical new legislation being proposed to INCREASE the powers of the GOVERNMENT in the name of "FIGHTING TERRORISM",but we have a potential "WORLD GOVERNMENT" to worry about that did not exist in 1933.

Does anyone know when the "OFFICE OF HOMELAND SECURITY" was first proposed? 1998 by the initiative of "FORMER"President Clintoon,sorry,Clinton and ..........Newt Gingrich. Both Members of the Council on Foreign Relations.
14 posted on 11/24/2001 12:37:03 PM PST by DAGO
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: america-rules
I won't get into this argument, but for several million military, there is none higher!
23 posted on 11/24/2001 12:50:32 PM PST by PatrioticAmerican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: america-rules
Is this a trick question? Because on the face of it, it is an absurd question to ask.
44 posted on 11/24/2001 2:20:26 PM PST by vladog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: america-rules
You'll get no book review from me.
45 posted on 11/24/2001 2:21:27 PM PST by Godfollow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Ms. AntiFeminazi
Per our discussion.
75 posted on 11/27/2001 7:50:00 AM PST by Hugh Akston
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: america-rules
Thank you for posting this! Finally someone who gets published speaks the truth and reads the laws.

It is our responsibility to know what laws our congress has passed and what bills our President has signed and what Executive Orders our President has issued. There are 70 plus replies on this thread and not one single reply actually references the Patriot Act. Well, here it is people. Read it!

MANDATORY READING FOR ALL FREEPERS:

H.R. 3162 - The Patriot Act

Executive Orders Issued by President Bush

78 posted on 11/27/2001 1:02:13 PM PST by Ms. AntiFeminazi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: america-rules
Yes he is, and I follow him gladly. :-0

Seriously, no he is not a dictator, and as the article points out, he is the latest in a long line of Presidents who made these decisions in wartime.
Keyword: WARTIME!

83 posted on 11/27/2001 8:26:44 PM PST by ladyinred
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: america-rules
as the New York Times matter-of-factly reports, "only the latest of many presidents to restrict civil liberties in wartime."

Funny, the NYT never said a word while Clinton was resident in the White House.

84 posted on 11/27/2001 8:29:25 PM PST by Slyfox
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: america-rules
Not yet........

But all those who would surrender their Freedom's for supposed security.....will help make him,or his succesor, one.

redrock

BILL OF RIGHTS BUMP!!!!!!

85 posted on 11/27/2001 8:37:38 PM PST by redrock
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: america-rules
Is the President a "Dictator"?

No. Next stupid question?

91 posted on 11/28/2001 8:00:06 AM PST by ctdonath2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: america-rules
Yes, Bush is becoming America's first fascist nazi dictator of America. His expansionism of governmental police power, creation of the fascist Home Land Defence, expansionism of this terrorist elimination war, government buy up of anthrax medicine, military at airports, and maybe soon military on every street corner, this man is a dictator soon to be.
103 posted on 12/01/2001 3:28:15 PM PST by AMMON-CENTRIST
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson