It makes no sense to get faith from an argument of any kind.
You're missing my point. Pascal's Wager is not an "argument" intended to intellectually persuade. It is an emotional appeal aimed at people who need an emotional appeal, for whom the relevant intellectual questions have already been answered. Pascal and later commentators are clear about this. But by disingenuously portraying it as an intellectual argument that purports to add logical support to its conclusion, anti-Christians have been able to attack Christianity as unintellectual and slander Pascal as illogical and fallacious.