Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Republic
I mean, would abortion be popular as a means of birth control IF having an abortion included a 50/50 life and death proposition for mommy?

That is exactly what you hope for, is it not? You want to force women into back alley abortions to increase their risk of death.

You would rather kill a functional, adult human woman with friends and family than allow for the death of her unborn fetus of unknown potential. You would rather kill an abortion clinic worker with friends and a family to support then allow for the death of a fetus with unknown potential.

Do not kid yourself. You are pro-death in your pious pro-life stance.

107 posted on 11/24/2001 1:58:39 PM PST by pcl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 98 | View Replies ]


To: pcl
I don't fear you, but any child that finds itself in your womb certainly should.

BTW, you seem to be very concerned with the potential for women's deaths from illegal abortions. You might be surprised to learn that according to the U.S. Bureau of Vital Statistics, there were 39 women who died from illegal abortions in 1972, the year before Roe v. Wade. (Link) Since there are an average of 1,500,000 abortions per year that's 38,461 dead babies per dead mother.

Whatever your delusions may be, the truth is that every baby in a womb (at any point in gestation) is a son or daughter. They aren't the enemy and they don't deserve to die.

109 posted on 11/24/2001 3:49:22 PM PST by Artist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 107 | View Replies ]

To: pcl
You are pro-death in your pious pro-life stance.

That is a genuinely sick thing to say, and demonstrates you amazing hatred for anyone who blemishes your stance on a mommy's right to control her body.

With ease, you ignore that mommy was INVOLVED in starting a new life, that she is home to this new life for a short period of time and then afterwards, the protector and nourisher of this new life as it grows and grows and continues to grow-both physically and hopefully mentally for much longer.

How is it so easy for you to be so vehemently for the mommy's right to say what happens to her body but to so easily ignore the growing life inside of her? Is it an out of sight out of mind thing with you? Or simply a perverted thought process that simply ignores the responsibility that goes with sexual activity. A baby is a consequence of sexual activity. That's just how it works. It's not magical, it is not something that is DONE to the mommy's body, it is a CHOICE. Mistake or not, once this happens, a new life and its total roadmap, genetically speaking, is determined when dad's sperm enters mom's egg and the chromosomes line up! BOOM! A life is begun. One that may go upwards of ONE HUNDRED YEARS in today's world. And you are so simple, so shallow, so heartless, that all you can think about is MOMMY's CONVENIENCE, MOMMY's BODY???? Never pausing to think of that yet to be formed voice that is in the making, just like your's and mine was at one time?

I'd love to see you debate your principle of a woman's right to abort a baby with God, pcl.

You need to fear those of us who would speak for the child. But you need to fear God more. And ya know, I fear FOR you. Because you are so cold and have bought into this infanticide as a means of birth control so completely, that you have allowed yourself to completely forget about the new life that has begun and the RIGHTS this new baby has. Aren't you GLAD your own mommy did not view you as an inconvenience? Aren't you glad your own mommy put more value on YOU than on herself and her, er, body? Aren't you glad your mommy took responsibility for her actions?

Infanticide is wrong. It is murder. And I don't want any mommy's dying trying to kill their babies. I don't want either dying. And neither has to die, unless some sick human being decides inconvenience to their, er, BODY (oh gish) or whatever the excuse might be, is worth killing the growing human being inside of the womb. Then, of course, the baby dies because people like you don't think this little one has a right to LIVE when juxtaposed against mommy's, er, body! How sick is that?

112 posted on 11/24/2001 4:14:47 PM PST by Republic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 107 | View Replies ]

To: pcl
I fear you! I really do.

You keep saying that. It must be hell to live such a fearful existence. But, considering your attitude towards innocent, defenseless unborn children, I fear for you as well.

I have voted Republican for 35 years.

Personally, I don't believe you.

If I thought that the anti-free choice faction of the Republican party would prevail due a Republican in office, I would change my vote.

The GOP platform is absolutely pro-life. The President is pro-life. The Vice-President is pro-life. Every R) congressional leader is pro-life. So, now that you know this fact, maybe you should head for the Evil Party, where you will fit in...although, if I had to guess, you most likely are a Dem already.

I would be willing to subject myself to the many evils of a liberal government if that was the only way I could keep free choice. I would grit my teeth and accept more gun control, higher taxes, bigger government and all the rest of the stink of a liberal government to avoid anti-free choice prevailing.

You are a real piece of work...give away the Bill of Rights, and everything you (and the rest of us) own, for the right to kill unborn babies. Wow. I'm almost speechless.

I am not the only conservative that feels this.

Uhmm...you're not a conservative...it is liberals who base their politics on what they feel.

I know numerous long time republicans who voted for Gore in this last election due to this one issue.

Wrong again. They aren't conservatives either. Not a single conservative in America voted for Gore, at least on purpose.

113 posted on 11/24/2001 4:38:26 PM PST by EternalVigilance
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 107 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson