Funny thing is that you cannot prove Browne wrong, but simply don't want to believe him. Look at how you are ready to make judgements void of facts.
You want me to prove that Bush is not bombing innocent civilians -- to prove a negative. Haaaa! You can't be serious. The burden of proof is on the accusation and neither Harry -- or you -- offer any proof.
No, Just realize that you accept one side without question or proof and that you reject the other side without question or proof. Is it as good as bush protrays or as bad as browne portrays?
I'll be leaving soon, and the reason I'm saying that is because there is at least one bozo out ther that will accuse me of running away if I don't reply promply.