Posted on 11/21/2001 11:54:19 AM PST by shuckmaster
Edited on 05/11/2004 5:33:22 PM PDT by Jim Robinson. [history]
COLUMBIA, Mo. (AP) -- Police at the University of Missouri have arrested a student suspected of destroying a Confederate flag in a dorm room.
Dave Sierpina, 18, of Aurora, Ill., was arrested on suspicion of second-degree burglary and property damage.
(Excerpt) Read more at stltoday.com ...
1864 Grant (republican)carried Tn Nc Sc Al Fl Wv
1868 Grant (republican) carried Tn Nc Sc Al Fl Wv Va
1872 Grant (republican) carried Nc Sc Va Al Fl Ms
And that didn't save us from the New Deal
The only states that didn't vote for Roosveldt in '36 were ME and VT - Likewise in '40 there were only 10 states that didn't vote for the communist bastard, so once again your statement makes no sense
Like I said, come back when you know what you're talking about
the scum of the earth that murdered Michael D. Westerbrook SAID that they ONLY murdered him in cold blood because he was PRO-CSA. sounds like hate to me.
for dixie,sw
2. the preservation of the union was NOT worth the loss of >1,000,000 lives-including at least 500,000 innocent civilians. if tommorrow 13 states decided to depart the union peacefully i would suggest that is quite acceptable, especially given the war alterenative.
3. to quote Tom Jefferson: "resistance to tyrants is obediance to God".
can you say TRAIL of TEARS, children? sure you can.
Actually Grant carried Tennessee in 1862. Sherman carried North and South Carolina in 1865 (chuckle, snort).
they cared/care about just ONE thing = POWER. true then, true now.
In what decision did the Supreme Court rule this please?
Wow, the South voted for the evil conquering hero. LOL
The only states that didn't vote for Roosveldt in '36 were ME and VT...
See, two Northern states. You guys are just as reponsible for socialism as we are.
...- Likewise in '40 there were only 10 states that didn't vote for the communist bastard, so once again your statement makes no sense Like I said, come back when you know what you're talking about
120, 108, same difference. The big years were the New Deal years.
1864 Grant (republican)carried Tn Nc Sc Al Fl Wv 1868 Grant (republican) carried Tn Nc Sc Al Fl Wv Va 1872 Grant (republican) carried Nc Sc Va Al Fl Ms
Wow, the South voted for the evil conquering hero. LOL
The only states that didn't vote for Roosveldt in '36 were ME and VT...
See, two Northern states. You guys are just as reponsible for socialism as we are.
...- Likewise in '40 there were only 10 states that didn't vote for the communist bastard, so once again your statement makes no sense Like I said, come back when you know what you're talking about
120, 108, same difference. The big years were the New Deal years.
When in Rome, speak Roman.
As long as Article IV, Section 1 is followed.
2. the preservation of the union was NOT worth the loss of >1,000,000 lives-including at least 500,000 innocent civilians.
I think it was. Millions were killed in WW2 because certain countries didn't have the ability to fend of Germany and Japan because of their smallness.
if tommorrow 13 states decided to depart the union peacefully i would suggest that is quite acceptable, especially given the war alterenative.
Go for it. How many are with you?
3. to quote Tom Jefferson: "resistance to tyrants is obediance to God".
1860 Southern slaveowners were the most tyrannical is Americas history.
1. the union is not an indivisible contract;the US Supreme Court said sucession was LAWFUL in 1866.
As long as Article IV, Section 1 is followed.
2. the preservation of the union was NOT worth the loss of >1,000,000 lives-including at least 500,000 innocent civilians.
I think it was. Millions were killed in WW2 because certain countries didn't have the ability to fend of Germany and Japan because of their smallness.
if tommorrow 13 states decided to depart the union peacefully i would suggest that is quite acceptable, especially given the war alterenative.
Go for it. How many are with you?
3. to quote Tom Jefferson: "resistance to tyrants is obediance to God".
1860 Southern slaveowners were the most tyrannical is Americas history.
Mistakes happen. You learn from them instead of vow to perpetuate them.
It was about preserving the union in a dangerous world.
See post 149
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.