Thought-provoking, in terms of what "nation-building" must consist of in order to succeed.
1 posted on
11/19/2001 6:02:04 AM PST by
walden
To: walden
Bump for a good read.
2 posted on
11/19/2001 9:43:57 AM PST by
Mahone
To: walden
Nice read
Hello, Islamic nations? Catching on yet?
3 posted on
11/19/2001 10:00:59 AM PST by
Harp
To: walden
Have his US HISTORY.Good man.
To: walden
Clash of civilizations bump. Bookmarked.
To: walden
Clash of civilizations bump. Bookmarked.
To: walden; A.J.Armitage; tex-oma; Architect; Pistias; LSJohn
Excellent, thanks.
Bumping my recent Defense of Liberty companions.
7 posted on
11/19/2001 2:10:09 PM PST by
annalex
To: walden
Great article. Bump.
To: walden
Yeah, the West is the embodiment of all that is good in human history. What has it brought the world?
Fascism. communism. Two World Wars. Colonialism. The Nation state. The atom bomb.
I'm not saying that the West hasn't brought many good things to the world as well. But the self-adulation in this post makes me want to puke.
Oh. By the way, Islamic fundamentalism has one and only one cause: the perversion of Islamic culture caused by more than a century of Western meddling and colonialism. The earlier Jihadism had been dead for a thousand years until we came along.
9 posted on
11/20/2001 8:48:51 AM PST by
Architect
To: walden
Why West Is Best
Because Jim Morrison said so??
To: walden
Its states are likely to have uneasy relations with the West until Islam reforms itself I am afraid that Islam has already "reformed itself," and that reform has led it backwards to the "pure" Islam of Mohammed. As late as the 13th Century Thomas Aquinas could propose a discussion with Muslims based on a common interest in western science--the science of Aristotle. But I see no Avicennas in the Islamic World.
14 posted on
11/20/2001 9:41:15 AM PST by
RobbyS
To: walden
All of us desire moral order. All of us wish for justice. The chief problem that faces a civilization is how to translate morality and justice into a workable system of law.Evil people don't want the moral order, nor do they want justice--unless they think it is in their interest. I thought the chief problem that faces a civilization is how to get people to love goodness and justice even when it conflicts with their perceived interests, or to educate them to the true value of goodness and justice.
20 posted on
11/20/2001 10:57:43 AM PST by
Pistias
To: walden
BUMP (My NR subscription ran out.)
27 posted on
11/20/2001 11:16:47 AM PST by
Aurelius
To: walden
The Magna Carta was the foundation. What we enjoy today was built upon it.
I learned this back in the 7th grade. Today, freedoms are taken for granted.
31 posted on
11/20/2001 11:35:27 AM PST by
johnny7
To: walden
Bookmarked
To: walden
Why West is BestSigh. This thread started off with some real potential.
72 posted on
11/26/2001 2:38:41 PM PST by
MaeWest
To: walden
I've come to feel that Philip Johnson is overrated. Better than liberal/socialist historians, yes, but that isn't saying much.
The notion that the Romans and Greeks invented law, or that they somehow elevated both to new heights, is not tenable. Just ask a slave, or a gladiator. It was Christianity that abolished the bloody arena games, and was to later abolish slavery as well.
77 posted on
11/26/2001 6:49:58 PM PST by
JoeSchem
To: walden
Compare the West to a relatively stagnant, primitive society, like Egypt under the Pharoh system.
They lasted for thousands of years. We will, quite possibly, create (or have created) the technology that will destroy humanity in the very near future. How do we "correct" for that?
79 posted on
11/26/2001 7:00:52 PM PST by
monkey
To: walden
Super article. Paul Johnson rules. We should give the muslims a quarter, and tell them to call us back in a thousand years -- if their civilization achieves anything worthy of note by then, that is.
To: *Clash of Civilizatio
Bumping to Clash of Civilizations list.
To: walden
From this long history, it has become evident that equality in law cannot be finally ensured without the mass participation of the public. But it is important to understand that the rule of law must be established first before democracy can successfully evolve. That is the great political lesson of Western civilization. I think Johnson skipped a step in here. What is the basis for the "rule of law" that needs to be established? At a minimum, there needs to be a consensus about an objective moral code.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson