Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: JeanS; freeforall
Everybody is to blame.

Those who left their pathetic homelands to become educated and comfy in "the West" and never cared enough to return home to practice their professions there are to blame.

Those who sit in their dreary corners and opt to just feel bad for themselves are to blame.

Those who just assume blame everyone else are to blame.

Those who would make it easy on themselves and prefer to pretend that "all those people" are not each individuals are to blame.

Those who don't care who they keep in power for the sake of cheap crude are to blame.

Those who would overthrow nationally elected governments for the sake of oil are to blame.

Those who allow their clerics to pass nonsence like "pray for rain" are to blame.

There's enough blame to go around for each of us to share in.

The real problem is that none of us really cares...
14 posted on 11/18/2001 1:56:23 PM PST by a_Turk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]


To: a_Turk
I think you misunderstood why I pointed out this article.Fisrt I do care IMHO every person deserves freedom as defined by this quote. "For, through knowledge, Khan would discover that his poverty stems from corrupt, dictatorial governments, the absence of capitalism and free trade, and the lack of individual rights and the rule of law. But who, in the Arab world, spreads this " The point was that certain segments of the world blame the west for all that is wrong in the world. ". Blame triumphs over enlightenment, and anger defeats reason." The concept of freedom is universal and is for all.
26 posted on 11/18/2001 3:01:15 PM PST by freeforall
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

To: a_Turk
"Everybody is to blame."

WRONG Bucko. I am NOT responsible in any way for the poverty of another. I don't steal, take unfair advantage, or co-opt anything from these people. If you want to accept blame or some of the blame, so be it. But keep me out of it!

Perhaps they should have a conversation with the Bin Laden family. I understand they have beau-coo bux, earned from the backs of their own subjects.

54 posted on 11/25/2001 12:02:15 PM PST by lawdude
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

To: a_Turk
The real problem is that none of us really cares...

Jesus cares, and so does His church. And it continues to try to help, even when it can be persecuted for doing so.

Unfortunately, I'd agree with you that most of the followers of Jesus don't care as much as He does.

Shalom.

71 posted on 11/26/2001 5:59:28 AM PST by ArGee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

To: a_Turk
You know that people do care. Usually it's on a one-on-one basis, but people will help others. Just less likely to do it if the others protest against them and blow up their buildings and people.
74 posted on 11/26/2001 12:21:30 PM PST by Republic of Texas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

To: a_Turk
bttt
108 posted on 12/22/2001 10:38:06 AM PST by timestax
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

To: a_Turk
There's enough blame to go around for each of us to share in.

Another way of saying "misery loves company". Explain to me how I am to blame for their situation. I don't even know any muslims, nor do I feel any responsibility for someone half-way around the world, who may live in poverty and dire circumstances through no fault of my own. The reference to the pie-chart is classic Liberal-think, i.e. that wealth is a zero-sum game. The idea that because one group of people has more, it means that they took it from the others is pure bull-winky! Our own economy proves it. If it were a zero-sum game, our economy could not expand, there would be no talk of increase in the GDP or GNP, and with each passing generation, as our population expanded, the wages, quality of life, and living standard would go down. Look at America's history, and you can see that's not the case. If it were, the Founding Fathers would have had the best lives, and each succeeding generation would have been less prosperous, and we'd be in a total state of anarchy by now.

The real problem is the fact that in those countries, the state is the religion, and the religion is the state. Without a free market economy, rule of law by the people, with the power to change laws that are abused and abusive, and checks and balances on the government, as well as personal freedom, those countries will never pull themselves out of the quagmire. When they point fingers at America, it is out of jealousy, not religious principle. And yet we have people in this country who would give it all away, out of some twisted sense of "fairness" and "leveling the playing field", and misplaced guilt. Instead of feeling guilty for the blessings we have received, we need to vigorously export our values, our system, our constitutional form of government. Some would call that Imperialism, showing that they know nothing about how governments and economies work.

Isn't it better to do what we can to "raise the tide", which will raise all boats? Or do we do what the Third World wants: drain the harbor, so all the boats are equally grounded and unable to move?

133 posted on 12/24/2001 7:11:09 AM PST by nobdysfool
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

To: a_Turk
bttt
194 posted on 01/05/2002 8:50:10 PM PST by timestax
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

To: a_Turk
bump
253 posted on 04/26/2002 7:50:47 PM PDT by timestax
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson