Posted on 11/17/2001 1:22:43 PM PST by forest
Hmm, I don't believe you. Why? Because XP doesn't get the standard Blue Screen errors that Windows 9x gets. You see, by default (you can change it), when XP encounters a fatal error (which is next to never, I've only had it happen thanks to my nVidia drivers), it automatically reboots. No blue screen at all. The only "blue screen" that XP would ever get is called an "NT STOP" error that you get when you boot up. That's a rarity and a very serious problem such as unable to find critical system files. I'm sure that's not what you're talking about. So, do I believe you? No.
"Stick with the tried and true, stable Windows 2000. Don't muck with Windows XP. It's as big a turkey as Windows ME."
Well, Windows 2000 is stable. XP is based on 2000, however, so if you have any problems with XP, it's based on drivers. XP does take a lot more memory than 2000 though, so if you're using older systems, I'd advise for 2000. But comparing it to ME is absurd.
On another note, Redaht 7.2 is outstanding. I recommend a KDE 2.2.1 desktop over Gnome, however. Out of the box, it works better on a Cyrix PR233 MHz CPU with 96 MB RAM (yeah...I know, ancient technology) than Windows XP on a 850 MHz Pentium III with 384 MB RAM.
ugh, not Linux again. Yeah, I'm sure it works better. Of course, you can't run anything you used to run on it. Have fun playing "XBill" and writing documents in some crappy office suite by the makers of Java, while I'm playing great 3D games and using the superb Office XP.
I've been running it since October 24. It crashed three times the first day. As I've been tweaking it, it's gotten better. It crashed once daily the first week, and only twice during the entire second week.
It's been seven days since I last crashed.
On another note, I've got an exposed Redhat Linux 6.2 box acting as a DNS server running BIND. It has never crashed nad I haven't even rebooted in 2 1/2 years!
Try getting online support without a Passport account. There are security bugs in Passport. I would recommend against storing any credit card numbers in its online database.
It does this once. Just once. All it sends is a unique hardware key configured to your system. They can't reverse this key and get out what hardware you have. It's a one-way hash.
and the idea that I can't mess around with my hardware setup without going through them.
Honestly, how often do you switch your hardware? I switch my hardware more than most people I know and I've never had to re-activate. Just in the past two months I've added an nVidia GeForce 2, SoundBlaster Audigy Platinum, and a Hauppague WinTV tuner card. No reactivation is necessary. In fact, you need to change 6 components within 120 days to trigger activation. And even then, if you're connected to the internet, all this means is you click "Next" about three times.
I also hate when software does things for me such as "fix" my OS.
I'm still not sure what you mean by this - how does it "fix" itself? I do notice a lot of behind the scenes operations by XP, but I am happier because of it. For example, there is a customized Start menu that rearranges the order based upon how often you use the applications. There is a desktop icon wizard that offers you the option to delete specific icons on your desktop which it knows you have not used often. All of these have the option of being disabled, obviously.
Same here. The "super-duper" video card on the new computer crashed the old monitor I had hooked to it. While checking things before getting a new monitor, I turned the computer on and off twice (shut down impropperly three times in a row).
When I installed a new monitor, up came XP as if nothing happened! No "scandisk," no nothing. It worked immediately.
However, I noticed that if I turn the computer on before the monitor, XP reverts to the DOS setup. That's a bit strange, but interesting to know.
I just got my first time in on Windows XP yesterday, on a 1.6 GHz P4 Sony Vaio desktop system. The speed (lack of) was appalling. Just poking around, opening control panels, various software, etc. Very bad. Uh... that's after I removed some background applications from startup, and rebooted. And, I did note that performance improved somewhat when I turned off all the glitz visual features that make XP look different from Win2000 and Win98.
The useful speed of this 1.6 GHz machine was far lower than my 850 MHz PIII with Win2000. And, it's far lower than any Win98 system I've seen, running on PII or PIII 350-450 MHz.
Mac hardware is just superior. There are plenty of software options to assist in compatibility. Macs are worth a second look. They sure turned my head ...
.. bravely ran away ...
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.