Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

The article has a big error in it that it says Reagan was pres from 84-92.

It is also no surprise that president Bush seeks to cover up for previous presidents. What is shocking to me is that in the order by Bush both the current president and the previous president who produced the document will have the legal right to alter the document before the historians get to see it. Isn't that a bit sick? We're not merely talking about delaying the release of documents, we're talking about altering them to mislead the historians. We're talking about falsification and cover-up. They are going to give us a sanitized history. I'm sure the Republican cheerleaders will like that.

Congratulations go to the Democrats for passing the Freedom of Information Act 30 years ago. I hope there are enough honest Democrats and honest Republicans in Congress to over-ride this bad order by King George.

One of the purposes for a free people making laws that force government documents to be made public is to discourage executive branch officials from misbehaving. If Bush' order stands, then there will apparently never be a time when independent historians will be allowed to look at these documents.

Is Bush covering up for Clinton's corruption or for his father's abuses of power? Is this also part of the War On Terrorism that documents made by either Bush or Clinton while president will be altered before they are released to the historians?

1 posted on 11/17/2001 9:11:28 AM PST by Red Jones
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-23 next last
To: Red Jones
This is Pravda, the communist organ of the former Soviet Union. And that might explain the falsehood in the title, "Bush... Alters Documents."

Lets see some evidence he has altered ONE document.

2 posted on 11/17/2001 9:16:20 AM PST by 11th Earl of Mar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: t-shirt
Bump
4 posted on 11/17/2001 9:22:29 AM PST by Red Jones
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Carry_Okie
bump
6 posted on 11/17/2001 9:25:49 AM PST by Red Jones
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Red Jones
Pravda? (snicker!) Movin' right along.....
7 posted on 11/17/2001 9:26:33 AM PST by Allegra
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Okiereddust
bump
8 posted on 11/17/2001 9:26:38 AM PST by Red Jones
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Howlin
Is Pravda in bed with Dean? Wouldn't be surprised...
11 posted on 11/17/2001 9:34:15 AM PST by Libloather
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Red Jones
Bush had to hide the previous president's papers to not arouse suspicion about his real motive: to conceal his own documents. His administration can run amuck.

"Great!", some of you will say, "He's a Republican". ....not so fast, a Democrat will land back in that office sooner or later.

I get a tear in my eye when I think of the damage of this executive order, along with Ashcroft's assault on the 4th amandment.

People, WAKE UP! Be wary of Government. Democrat or Republican. Period.

27 posted on 11/17/2001 10:15:53 AM PST by Diverdogz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Red Jones
Did you know....................

according to the PRAVDA 'forum', www.freerepublic.com "bans" articles from PRAVDA?

Gee........isn't that interesting?

29 posted on 11/17/2001 10:20:48 AM PST by Thumper1960
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Red Jones
An old Russian expression, written phoenetically:

Pravdi ni pravda.

Translation: Truth (the newspaper) doesn't speak the truth.

You might keep that in mind...

33 posted on 11/17/2001 10:28:35 AM PST by Capitalist Eric
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Red Jones
I'd like to see if anyone can disprove what the article says regarding the altering of documents.

This is the pertinent issue. Whether it came from Pravada or Mad Magazine...if it's true...it's true. I guess it more important to try to do damage control for Bush than to try and get at the real truth.

34 posted on 11/17/2001 10:31:20 AM PST by Aerial
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Red Jones
OH GOOD WEBSITE----NOT.
Nothing like a little commie propaganda to start the day, eh?

Here's another Patriotic American headline I found at Pravada!:

LEW ROCKWELL: THE PRINTING PRESS PAYS FOR WAR In a little-noticed announcement, the Center for Strategic and Budgetary Assessments has made a stab at estimating the direct costs of this splendid little war against Afghanistan. In the past this group has provided a very useful service in telling us exactly what the Pentagon is loath to talk about: how many taxpayer dollars our military central planners are plowing through on any given day...

Gee, no mention of America defending itself from terrorists attacks. DUH !!
Since when do the commies care about spending tax dollars? Are they afraid their welfare checks may get lowered??
Sounds like a liberal leftie touchie-feelie victimization type web site, eh?

36 posted on 11/17/2001 10:43:23 AM PST by concerned about politics
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Red Jones
Timothy BANCROFT-HINCHEY hates the NATO, America, and just about anything Western. If you don't believe it just do a Google search for his name and read his articles. His articles appear in such reputable websites as Anti-Imperialist League - Peace and Resistance. Consider the source.
44 posted on 11/17/2001 10:52:31 AM PST by Reagan is King
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Red Jones; All
Pravda, Schmavda...

The important thing in this is that we will lose our right to open government, which is one of the keystones of liberty. As far as presidents altering historical documents Nixon did : remember the 18 minute gap in the tapes? That incident probably was what inspired the 1978 law.

Is there some reason that we can't have an honest government? The papers from the Reagan presidency, if released, will apparently cause a lot of damage to both Bush Sr. and W. Why else is Bush fighting this?

(Re: the "gap": whas it 18 minutes or 18 seconds? I forgot.

46 posted on 11/17/2001 10:58:21 AM PST by SR71A
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Red Jones
I don't like it either. I don't like the insinuation that he has to hide documents because he has cabinet members from his Dad's and Reagan's era.
49 posted on 11/17/2001 11:03:07 AM PST by WriteOn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Red Jones
PRAVDA = for entertainment purposes
65 posted on 11/17/2001 12:33:14 PM PST by Frankiedi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Red Jones
The fact that you said, "King George" tells me all I need to know, you are not exactly coming at this from an unbiased mindset. No further discussion would do any good, so I will leave you to your entertainment. Carry on.
67 posted on 11/17/2001 4:32:59 PM PST by ladyinred
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-23 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson