Posted on 11/17/2001 5:54:59 AM PST by George Frm Br00klyn Park
eco-logic
---- on-line ----
A HUGE Victory for Local Governments
By Karen Budd Falen
We have a great victory for local land use planning advocates in the federal land planning process. On September 1, 2001, a Federal Court Judge in the District of Utah ruled that based upon the existence of a local land use plan, the Plaintiffs, Uintah County, Utah and the Ute Indian Tribe had standing to challenge a Bureau of Land Management ("BLM") environmental assessment ("EA") releasing wild horses into a certain area in the County. The Court found that based upon the County land use plan which advocated a desired wild horse level of "zero" and the County's letter to the BLM stating its position, the County had standing to sue the BLM when the BLM issued an EA that was inconsistent with the County's position. The Court also granted the same standing rights to the Ute Indian Tribe based upon the BLM's failure to coordinate with the Tribe in violation of the Federal Land Policy and Management Act ("FLPMA").
With regard to the substance of the BLM's decision, the Court ruled that in this case, the BLM failed to comply with the "coordination and consistency requirements" in FLPMA. Although the BLM claimed that the "consistency with local land use plans provision" in FLPMA only applied to formal land use plans, the Court determined that the consistency review requirements apply "'when the Secretary is making decisions directly affecting the actual management of public lands' whether formally characterized as 'resource management plan' activity or not."
Third, the Court defined the consultation requirement in FLPMA. According to the Court, "coordination and consultation requires that the BLM have a narrowly focused discussion with the Tribe [and local governments] concerning the proposed agency action. Further the Department of the Interior's Manual requires that coordination include 'a specific description of the places and/or values at issue.'" (Citations omitted). Based upon the failure of the BLM to have an adequate consistency review with the local government and Indian tribe, the Court set aside the BLM's decision.
Although I did not write the winning brief, I take credit and give credit to Jim Catron, Ron White, Alex Thal, Adam Polley, Howard Hutchinson, Dick Manning and others for this case. The Uintah County, Utah land use plan was written based upon the work of the National Federal Land Conference. The legal briefs were based upon materials that I supplied to the counsel for the Ute Indian Tribe and Uintah County, Utah that were based upon the "Catron County model." You should be very pleased and proud of your work. WE WERE RIGHT! THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT CANNOT JUST IGNORE US!
THIS Article at ECO - LOGIC
P, Yeh. Tell that to the people who have already created "Wilderness Areas" in this country, and around the world. People used to live in many of them. Or at least visit every now and then. They're here. But, who has the wherewithal and "standing" to challenge them in the courts? Peace and love, George.
I've got mixed feelings about the land grabs. On one hand I feel that they help further alienate good folks from the fedgov, therefore making more allies.
On the other hand........................ well, let the fedgov keep it up :-)
RD84, The gestapo tactics do awaken some real hardheaded people. But, it is generally the weaker ones that the omnipotent godgov targets. Nah. Gotta fight them tooth and nail. Figuratively speaking of course. Peace and love, George.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.