[Mmmike]

Here is my best guess. You have your own assumptions which claim to account for certain people and/or beliefs in their entirety; and, seeing the logic of those assumptions and hoping to have some fun, you endeavor to belittle them in a way that won't get you some kind of formidable backlash. So you do some pshaw-ing and when you feel you're about to get some backlash, you walk through a litany that your assumptions prescribe and then you say, "See, there's no point in talking to you."

[Capitalist Eric]

you endeavor to belittle them...

Endeavor? There's no "endeavor" about it...

when you feel you're about to get some backlash...

There's no point in talking rationally with someone who has no facts, nothing substantive to back up their claims. Religion is based entirely on emotion and wishful thinking, not substance. When they try to introduce some religious dogma as a given fact, it relegates their argument to that of zealot.

Kinda' like the Taliban.

And liberals...

But, you already knew that, right?