[ladyinred]

I have no idea if this is a coverup or if it is a tragic accident, having said that, I am a little bewildered at your comment.
The loss of confidence in the airline industry causing many airlines to go belly up, jobs being lost, the ecomony taking yet more dumps due to this is not a compelling reason for a coverup to you?
Again, I don't pretend to know if this was terror related or not, and I sure don't understand technology talk to know what to think of the wind from another airliner theory, but I do see why they might not want to tell us what happened if it is terrorism!

If I have the facts correct, the Clinton administration under the direction of Al Gore did nothing about a report it had commissioned about airline security when the airlines complained that the negative findings would undermine their financial futures if released to the public. Instead they kept it quiet, took campaign contributions from the airlines and well, the rest is history.

[dead]

The loss of confidence in the airline industry causing many airlines to go belly up, jobs being lost, the ecomony taking yet more dumps due to this is not a compelling reason for a coverup to you?

As I said elsewhere on this thread, you are suggesting that in order to try to salvage confidence in the airline industry, the government is trying to convince people that mere wind blew the tail off of an airplane.

And somehow that conspiracy theory makes sense to you? The government’s plan to insure people that air travel is safe is to tell them that wind can blow airplanes to pieces.

I’m sorry, but that is the stupidest thing I’ve ever heard.