Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

FBI Sitting on Flt. 587 Videotape
Newsmax ^ | 11.16.01 | Newsmax

Posted on 11/16/2001 1:24:12 PM PST by callisto

A videotape that could show exactly what happened to American Airlines Flight 587, which crashed three minutes after taking off from New York's JFK airport on Monday, is in the hands of the FBI -- but the bureau has thus far declined to release it.

New York City's Metropolitan Transportation Authority spokesman Tom Kelly confirmed to the Daily News Friday that the agency has given surveillance videotapes from Cross Bay Blvd. and Marine Parkway bridges to the FBI.

"One tape captures the plane taking off from JFK," the News said.

Cross Bay Blvd. and Marine Parkway traverse Jamaica Bay, where the plane's vertical stabilizer was discovered intact after the crash.

Dozens of eyewitnesses have told media outlets they saw an explosion and/or a fire at the juncture of Flt. 587's wing and fusilage moments before it began to break up, losing its tail first, then both its engines.

Catastrophic engine failure, which was first suspected to have caused the explosion, was ruled out Tuesday after NTSB investigators examined the engines and found no evidence of mechanical failure.

Since discovering the engines were working properly, NTSB spokeswoman Marion Blakely -- along with most media outlets -- have quietly dropped references to witness accounts of a midair explosion.

The NTSB now says that wind turbulence from another plane is the most likely cause of the crash. One former jumbo jet veteran pilot was highly skeptical of the turbulence theory.

"If wind turbulence caused that accident, I'll never fly again," Barry Schiff, who flew 747's for TWA, told the New York Post.

But a videotape showing the exact sequence of Flt. 587's break-up could clear up any mystery, showing whether or not the break-up was caused by an explosion or by turbulence.

It's not clear why the FBI has not yet released the MTA video -- or even commented on what it shows. It's also not clear why the Flt. 587 video was not turned over to the NTSB instead of the FBI, which had reportedly adopted a secondary role in the wake of NTSB claims that the crash was an accident.

When an Air France Concorde jetliner crashed after catching fire on takeoff from a rural French airport last year, an amatuer video of the accident was released within 48 hours.

Calls to the FBI's New York office and to MTA spokesman Kelly were not returned by presstime.


TOPICS: Breaking News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: aaflight587; flight587
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 261-277 next last

1 posted on 11/16/2001 1:24:12 PM PST by callisto
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: callisto
I think it was mentioned at yesterday's NTSB press conference that the video was sent away to see if the image could be enhanced as the plane showed up only as a small dot.
2 posted on 11/16/2001 1:24:13 PM PST by vrwc54
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: callisto
Hmmm.
3 posted on 11/16/2001 1:24:13 PM PST by TheErnFormerlyKnownAsBig
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: vrwc54
A small dot with a big red explosion????

NeverGore

4 posted on 11/16/2001 1:24:13 PM PST by nevergore
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: vrwc54
A small dot can be useful if it illuminates with flames before the tail wing separates.

BTW -- It's not clear why the FBI has not yet released the MTA video -- or even commented on what it shows. It's also not clear why the Flt. 587 video was not turned over to the NTSB instead of the FBI, which had reportedly adopted a secondary role in the wake of NTSB claims that the crash was an accident.

Shades of the FBI intervening coverup of TWA800.

5 posted on 11/16/2001 1:24:13 PM PST by flamefront
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: callisto
The problems with stories like these is that different dozens of witnesses saw different dozens of things but I've learned to take everything from Newsmax with a ton of salt.
6 posted on 11/16/2001 1:24:13 PM PST by sakic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nevergore
yes it was mentioned yesterday...
A GOOD NEWS SOURCE ON ANYTHING..CLICK
7 posted on 11/16/2001 1:24:13 PM PST by newsperson999
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

Evidence of chemical explosives should also show up from the physical evidence. So far the tailwing looks clean and unimpacted, though.
8 posted on 11/16/2001 1:24:14 PM PST by flamefront
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: callisto
Coverup. Pure and simple.
9 posted on 11/16/2001 1:24:14 PM PST by Avi8tor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: big ern
It will never be released. The video shows a small winged creature flying into one of the engines thus causing a huge explosion, blowing the aircraft apart. If these images are released it would be a grave danger to national security. The prospects of Americans realizing that the greatest threat is not Arab terrorists, but evil kamikaze birds, would send the world markets and holiday travel into a tailspin!
10 posted on 11/16/2001 1:24:14 PM PST by pistola
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: callisto
Hello! Remember TWA 800? Here we go again - but why? Which is the worse - probable future mechanical failures because of NTSB's failure to act promptly in grounding all A300s, or a successful terrorist sabotage?

In the latter instance, the government would have to admit failure to protect the public - I guess they are not willing to do that. Why? Is the American public unable to accept that? I am afraid much more will come.

11 posted on 11/16/2001 1:24:14 PM PST by First Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: callisto
It's not clear why the FBI has not yet released the MTA video -- or even commented on what it shows.

It's pretty clear to me. But of course I could be wrong.

12 posted on 11/16/2001 1:24:14 PM PST by KillerWabbit
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: callisto
Winged monkeys got caught in the engines. Or flying pigs...
13 posted on 11/16/2001 1:24:14 PM PST by LurkedLongEnough
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: callisto
Based on TWA800 track record, they ought to keep FBI out of this investigation at all costs.
14 posted on 11/16/2001 1:24:14 PM PST by VRWC_minion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: callisto
Carefull tin foilers, if you don't believe the experts here at FR that say the wind blew the plane down, they're going to CALL YOU NAMES....oooo....scary!
15 posted on 11/16/2001 1:24:15 PM PST by concerned about politics
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: flamefront
The NTSB gal keeps talking "turbulence" and completely ignoring the eyewitness accounts of an explosion, which makes me slightly suspicious.
16 posted on 11/16/2001 1:24:15 PM PST by Ironword
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: callisto; Nita Nupress; OKCSubmariner; thinden; LSJohn; Judge Parker; rdavis84; honway; Plummz
Gee, isn't this familiar. We're all still waiting to see the security videos of the Murrah Building just before the explosion (and perhaps some just after) it was blown up. They're still "under seal" and unavailable. Probably best not to hold your breath waiting for this video.
17 posted on 11/16/2001 1:24:15 PM PST by MizSterious
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All
I still haven't seen anybody make a convincing case for the reasoning behind a coverup.

Terrorism or crappy plane design? Either way, airline/hotel/tourism business is going to dry up.

Seems to me that terrorism is the easier fix - El Al style boarding rules, bomb sniffing dogs on the runway, no foreign nationals working anywhere in airports, etc.

Crappy plane design would be a much bigger problem for the airlines, and would therefore be more likely to inspire a cover-up.

18 posted on 11/16/2001 1:24:15 PM PST by dead
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #19 Removed by Moderator

To: vrwc54
a small dot..sorry, that is garbage. It was captured just taking off, meaning it would be not a small dot, but bigger than that!
20 posted on 11/16/2001 1:24:15 PM PST by rwfromkansas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 261-277 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson