Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: callisto
Hello! Remember TWA 800? Here we go again - but why? Which is the worse - probable future mechanical failures because of NTSB's failure to act promptly in grounding all A300s, or a successful terrorist sabotage?

In the latter instance, the government would have to admit failure to protect the public - I guess they are not willing to do that. Why? Is the American public unable to accept that? I am afraid much more will come.

11 posted on 11/16/2001 1:24:14 PM PST by First Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: First Conservative
Don't forget the Titanic.

That was a Zionest conspiracy.

C'mon the perps last name was "Iceberg"

36 posted on 11/16/2001 1:24:18 PM PST by Yankee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

To: First Conservative
Hello! Remember TWA 800? Here we go again - but why?

(TIN-FOIL HAT: On.)

Osama bin Laden first attempted to destroy the World Trade Center in 1993 but the Clinton administration failed to go after him and capture him. Apparently, they didn't want to risk the complications of an international incident.

TWA 800 involved a terrorist using a Stinger anti-aircraft missile. If that news got out, people would ask why bin Laden hadn't been captured yet, and there would be a national scandal. So the Clinton administration covered it up.

Today, we have AA 587 crashing under circumstances very similar to TWA 800. If it turns out that there is evidence that 587 was hit by a terrorist missile, then of course it becomes very obvious to draw the line back to 800, and people start to say, "Cover Up!" and the Clinton House of Cards collapses.

The Bush administration is not behind the current cover-up. Rather, the cover-up is being perpetrated by the bureaucrats within the NSTB and FBI who are Clinton-era holdovers. Their fingerprints are on the 800 cover-up, so they want to cover up 587 as well.

Bush is far too trusting of these people, forgetting what they did to Waco and what they didn't do in preventing September 11. At some point, if he doesn't act to flush these people out of their respective agencies and appoint new blood, the current President must be held responsible for the sins of the previous President.

(TIN-FOIL HAT: Off.)

163 posted on 11/16/2001 1:25:03 PM PST by JoeSchem
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

To: First Conservative
Good call: The government is afraid to admitt the increased security failed here, especially if evidence exists that it was a terrorist act(act of war).

The government is trying to maintain public tranquility to get everyone behaving normally again, most notably for the very busy Thanksgiving Holiday period.

They further want holiday spending to be upbeat to inspire the economy, thus maintain the propaganda that has worked in the past.
198 posted on 11/16/2001 1:26:59 PM PST by Soul Citizen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson